Skip to main content
Movie poster for Touch (2024)

Touch

“Discover what might have been.”

2024
2h 1m
Play trailer

Overview

Soon after the break of the pandemic and realizing that his clock is ticking, Kristofer gets the urge to embark on a journey to try to find out what really happened when his Japanese girlfriend mysteriously vanished without a trace from London fifty years earlier.

Cast

12 people

Reviews

Brent Marchant

Many of us have experienced situations in life that have left us wondering “what might have been,” especially in matters of romance. And sometimes these scenarios can linger in our psyche for a lifetime, gnawing away at us and potentially leaving us with feelings of profound regret. Some of us, though, vow not to succumb to such disappointment, taking action to resolve these matters before it’s too late. Such is the case of a 75-year-old Icelandic man (Egill Ólafsson) suffering from the onset of dementia during the early days of the COVID pandemic. With the clock running out, his health faltering and stringent quarantine measures being put into place, he’s nevertheless desperate to learn what happened to the love of his life, a beautiful young Japanese immigrant (Kōki) he met 51 years earlier while his younger self (Pálmi Kormákur) was living in London. After a brief, passionate love affair, she suddenly vanished and returned to Japan without an explanation, an event that has haunted him ever since. He decides to search for her before health and travel restrictions prevent him from doing so, an impulsive journey that takes him back to London and then on to Japan to find out what happened. To say much more would reveal too much about the secrets driving this compelling romance/mystery, suffice it to say, though, that the protagonist’s tale is an engaging one, told through an absorbing story line deftly peppered with flashbacks to different points in the characters’ lives. In telling this story of love and intrigue, writer-director Baltasar Kormákur presents a colorful mix of genuinely original characters in a variety of circumstances not depicted on the big screen before. Admittedly, the pacing could stand to be stepped up in a few places (an outcome that could have been accomplished with some judicious editing), and further enhancement of the back story and character development might have provided more meaningful depth to the overall narrative. However, given the captivating trail of bread crumbs that the filmmaker doles out for viewers, this heartfelt release leaves audience members continually wondering what’s coming next. And, in doing so, the picture serves up a number of little-known, eye-opening cultural revelations that add spice and diversity to a genre that seldom ventures into such unfamiliar territory, an objective carried out with a tremendous sense of warmth without becoming unduly sentimental. In my view, this is the picture that the vastly overrated “Past Lives” (2023) was trying to be (and could have been), one that entertains, enlightens and educates all at the same time while providing audiences with a tale that’s sure to tug at the heartstrings – and shows us how “what might have been” could have actually been brought into being.

Read full review

CinemaSerf

Anyone else think that Egill Ólafsson turned slowly into Lord Olivier in this drama? He's "Kristófer" - an elderly Icelander whom, on the cusp of global lockdown, flies to London to retrace some steps from his earlier life in the 1970s. Then he (Palmi Kormákur) was a disillusioned student at the LSE who jacks it all in to go and work in a small Japanese restaurant in Soho. He's an handsome and engaging lad who soon fits into the family infrastructure of the place, willing to learn their language and how to prepare some of their speciality dishes - and also willing to befriend daughter "Miko" (Kôki). As the story develops, we see a burgeoning love story set against a backdrop of a family that hastily left their homeland after the end of the war, and that have some fairly traumatic links with the events that led, ultimately, to it's conclusion. The production knits some early seventies music into a storyline that also suggests "Kristófer" hasn't too much time left on his own clock as he uses virtually no information to see if he can track down his former love. I suppose the romantic elements to this are a little on the predictable side, but director Baltasar Kormâkur manages to elicit from both versions of the man, from the impressive young Kôki and from the emotionally conflicted father "Takahashi" (Masahiro Motoki) performances that are mischievous and celebratory at times whilst also touching and quite emotionally charged. The theme also reminds us that many innocent citizens born and as yet unborn were affected by the actions of 1945 than continued to haunt generations long afterwards. I didn't quite love the ending, but this is quite a subtle powerfully story that's worth a watch.

Read full review

Audience Opinions

Audience 7.4/10
"A tender, cross-cultural lost-love story carried by heartfelt performances and atmosphere, but slowed down by a very gentle pace and a few underdeveloped threads."

Emotional impact, the decades-spanning romance, and the sincerity of Kristófer and Miko’s relationship stand out, with many calling the film quietly powerful, comforting, and even one of their favorite love stories in years. The mix of Icelandic and Japanese settings, the focus on hibakusha history, and the warm visual style in the flashbacks are praised as both moving and refreshing. At the same time, the very slow pacing, uneven focus on the dementia storyline, and a handful of side plots that feel either confusing or thin keep some viewers at a distance.

What viewers praise
  • Deeply affecting love story The decades-long search for a first love, framed by grief and aging, hits hard emotionally and leaves many feeling genuinely moved by the ending.
  • Strong central performances Egill Ólafsson’s gentle, worn-down older Kristófer and Kōki’s warm, charismatic Miko are frequently singled out as believable, engaging leads.
  • Cross-cultural richness The Icelandic-Japanese relationship, language switching, and focus on Japanese postwar experience and hibakusha give the romance an uncommon and appreciated depth.
  • Warm, thoughtful visual style The contrast between nostalgic, warm-toned 1960s London and the cooler pandemic-era present enhances the sense of memory, loss, and the passage of time.
  • Gentle, comforting tone Despite heavy themes like illness, war trauma, and the pandemic, the film maintains a soft, compassionate mood that some describe as soothing and life-affirming.
Common complaints
  • Very slow pacing More than a few viewers find the story sluggish, especially in the early stretch, and admit they were bored until the central romance fully takes hold.
  • Dementia thread underused The early-stage dementia diagnosis that kicks off Kristófer’s journey is barely explored later, which makes this aspect feel like an abandoned idea.
  • Uneven focus and loose ends Certain side elements, such as parts of Kristófer’s family life and his wife’s choices, come across as confusing or unnecessary to the main emotional arc.
  • Not ideal for casual viewing The quiet storytelling, long runtime, and reflective tone make it a poor fit for those expecting a snappier, plot-driven romance or conventional crowd-pleaser.
  • Divisive tone and sentimentality Some find the film achingly lovely while others see it as overly sentimental or too neat in how it resolves the long-gestating mystery.
Recommended for
Slow-burn romantic drama fans Cross-cultural love story seekers Emotion-driven character drama lovers Viewers interested in hibakusha stories Gentle pandemic-era narratives Cinematography and atmosphere appreciators

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports

“Touch” (2024): The Surprisingly Messy Love Story Behind the Camera

When you bought a ticket for Touch, you signed up for wistful romance, cross‑continental longing and tasteful tears. What you maybe didn’t realize? The real-life saga behind this indie weepie is quietly packed with divorce drama, nepo-baby whispers, health crises and a dash of cultural controversy. Buckle up: the softest movie of 2024 has some unexpectedly sharp edges.


On-Set Drama & Real-Life Heartache

  • The director was living his own breakup movie. While steering this decades-spanning love story, director Baltasar Kormákur was going through what he bluntly called a “traumatic” divorce in real life. He’s admitted that the split, which happened not long before or during the film’s development, pushed him into a full rethink of his life and bled directly into how he adapted the novel, especially its themes of regret and unfinished business . Talk about channelling pain into art.
  • Casting under pressure of personal turmoil. Kormákur says he rang up novelist Ólafur Jóhann Ólafsson just two days after reading the book, eager to collaborate—something he links to the soul‑searching triggered by that breakup [1]. So if the movie feels extra raw about lost love and second chances, that’s because its director was basically in emotional free fall while making it.

Family Ties, Nepo Vibes & “Is This a Group Chat Project?”

  • It started as a literal family recommendation. According to an Icelandair feature, Touch began as a genuine family affair: one of Kormákur’s daughters read the novel and told him, essentially, “Dad, this is so your next movie.” From there, it evolved into a full-blown clan project .
  • Then he cast his son in the male lead. Young Kristófer is played by Pálmi Kormákur—yes, the director’s son. Officially, the story is that the casting director floated his name, he sent in audition tapes, and then producers and department heads all signed off before dad said yes [1]. But even Kormákur has acknowledged he was nervous about the optics and didn’t want his own kid hurt by any potential backlash. Still, viewers have definitely side‑eyed the situation as classic “nepo baby, but make it Icelandic” [1][2].
  • Kōki brings double nepo energy. On the Japanese side, you’ve got Mitsuki Kimura, better known as Kōki—daughter of J‑idol royalty Takuya Kimura and singer Shizuka Kudo—playing Miko. Profiles on her openly lean into the fact she’s continuing the “family business,” moving from modelling into acting with mega-famous parents cheering her on . While the interviews themselves are glowing, online chatter has lumped her firmly into the global “nepo baby” conversation.

Health Scares & Brutal Acting Challenges

  • A Parkinson’s diagnosis mid‑journey. The film’s older Kristófer, Egill Ólafsson, wasn’t just playing a man in physical and mental decline—he was working through his own health bombshell. Kormákur revealed that Ólafsson was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease while they were making the movie [1]. Production had to slow down; the director gave him extra time to shoot, building the schedule around his condition.
  • The left‑handed nightmare. As if that weren’t enough, continuity turned into a bizarre physical challenge: Pálmi plays young Kristófer left‑handed, while Ólafsson is naturally right‑handed. To keep their performances aligned, the older actor was asked to re‑train himself to move and perform actions left‑handed—while dealing with Parkinson’s symptoms [1]. Kormákur has called that combination of physicality, multilingual dialogue and illness “possibly the hardest thing I’ve ever asked an actor to do” [1]. Suddenly that quiet restaurant scene feels a lot more hardcore.

Scandals & Cultural Controversies

  • Hibakusha drama: “Is this trauma just set dressing?” The film’s subplot revealing that Miko and her family are Hiroshima survivors (hibakusha) has stirred up serious criticism. South China Morning Post gave Touch a chilly 2/5, calling it warm in tone but “shallow” and “hollow” in its portrayal of atomic bomb survivors . The complaint: the trauma of Hiroshima is dangled as a heavy emotional twist yet never fully explored, making it feel like a convenient backstory for a white‑guy romance.
  • Reviewers divided on tone. While many Western critics swooned over the tenderness and scope, SCMP’s review and other Asia‑focused commentary argue the movie leans into cliché and centers the Icelandic man’s feelings over the Japanese characters’ generational pain [4]. It hasn’t exploded into a massive boycott, but among film Twitter and Asian movie circles, the “is this respectful, or is this aestheticized trauma?” debate has definitely been a thing.

Romance Rumors & Fan Speculation

  • Kōki + Pálmi = are they or aren’t they? There’s no confirmed off‑screen romance, but TikTok has decided it ships these two. Fan edits of Kōki and Pálmi’s scenes, complete with longing glances and Very Dramatic music, pull huge numbers, and some posters flatly insist “no way they acted this well without catching feelings.” That is pure fan speculation—no outlet has proven anything—but the chemistry is strong enough that the rumor mill keeps grinding .
  • Soft‑launch conspiracy theories. A few eagle‑eyed fans have pointed to them looking a little too cozy in promo clips and behind‑the‑scenes snippets, wondering if they’re pulling the classic “we’re just colleagues!” soft launch. Again, unconfirmed, but the internet is happily writing its own sequel.

Wild Trivia & Deep-Cut Nuggets

  • This movie might not exist without lockdown. Kormákur has said Touch grew out of the isolation of COVID lockdown, when he was rethinking his life, his relationships and what stories he wanted to tell next [1][2]. Between a global pandemic and a personal divorce, the guy basically turned a midlife crisis into a cross‑continental tearjerker.
  • Two families, one film. Between the Kormákurs (director, daughter who found the book, son who stars) and Kōki’s Kimura/Kudo dynasty, Touch is arguably one of the most quietly dynastic films of 2024—like a low‑key, art‑house version of a Hollywood studio movie cast entirely from the same five famous families [2][3].

Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.