Skip to main content
Movie poster for Mercy (2026)

Mercy

“Prove your innocence to an AI judge or face execution.”

2026
1h 40m
Play trailer

Overview

In the near future, a detective stands on trial accused of murdering his wife. He has ninety minutes to prove his innocence to the advanced AI Judge he once championed, before it determines his fate.

Cast

12 people

Reviews

3 min read

The Screen Stares Back: Justice in the Age of Algorithms

It feels like Timur Bekmambetov has lost interest in the physical world entirely. For over a decade, the Russian-Kazakh director has been the most vocal champion of 'screenlife' cinema—those movies like Unfriended and Profile that take place strictly on computer monitors and smartphones. With Mercy, he pushes that obsession into a near-future sci-fi thriller, blending his desktop gimmicks with a standard suspense framework.

The result is a messy, cynical, but weirdly compelling experiment about what happens when we outsource our morality to a microprocessor.

The setup is a high-tech pressure cooker in a gritty, rain-blurred 2029 Los Angeles. LAPD Detective Chris Raven wakes up strapped to an execution chair, accused of murdering his wife. He has exactly ninety minutes to prove his innocence to Mercy Court, an automated judicial system he actually helped champion.

His only lifeline is access to every surveillance camera, text message, and digital footprint in the city, all projected through AR screens floating right in front of his face.

A futuristic execution chair illuminated by glowing data screens

This scenario traps Chris Pratt in a corner, both literally and as an actor. We’re so used to his kinetic, bouncy charisma—the Star-Lord energy he uses to carry a scene. But here, immobilized and playing a grieving, alcoholic cop, he’s stripped of those usual tools.

Audience Opinions

Audience 6.1/10
"A slick, fast-moving AI courtroom thriller whose tense concept and leads are undercut by shaky logic, over-the-top acting, and a divisive screenlife style."

The real-time trial setup, countdown clock, and AI-judge concept keep tension high, with some viewers calling it a gripping, entertaining popcorn thriller that looks great and never drags. Others bounce off the screen-bound presentation, overcooked performance from Chris Pratt, and what they see as implausible police work, underdeveloped AI ethics, and a twist they can see coming long before the finale.

What viewers praise
  • Engaging high-concept premise The idea of an AI running an entire justice process, with a detective racing a visible countdown to prove his innocence, is seen as fresh, tense, and thought-provoking.
  • Tight pacing and suspense The 90-ish minute runtime, real-time structure, and constant stream of evidence and revelations keep the story moving briskly with little downtime.
  • Lead chemistry works The dynamic between Chris Pratt’s volatile cop and Rebecca Ferguson’s calm AI presence is often singled out as compelling enough to carry the movie.
  • Striking visuals and UI design The futuristic interfaces, chair, and building, along with the multi-screen, found-footage-inspired framing, are praised as slick and convincing for the budget.
Common complaints
  • Divisive screenlife presentation The constant on-screen windows, feeds, and interfaces feel like a headache-inducing gimmick to those who find the format exhausting rather than immersive.
  • Overacting and thin character work Chris Pratt’s near-constant shouting and intensity is seen as cartoonish, while Rebecca Ferguson’s AI is described as too passive and limited to staring and exposition.
  • Shaky logic and procedure Viewers with any familiarity with policing or technology call the AI justice system pure fantasy, pointing out basic errors in investigation, evidence handling, and internal rules of the world.
  • Predictable and undercooked mystery The murder plot and late reveals are often described as easy to spot halfway through, with twists that feel random or unearned rather than cleverly set up.
  • Shallow use of AI themes Despite the timely premise, the story never fully digs into the ethical and emotional implications, leaving the AI politics and social commentary feeling surface-level or muddled.
Recommended for
High-concept sci-fi thriller fans Screenlife and found-footage experimenters Chris Pratt completists Rebecca Ferguson admirers Popcorn courtroom suspense seekers AI dystopia and tech-noir watchers

Full Plot (Spoilers)

Spoiler warning

This section contains the full plot, including major story reveals. Overview above stays spoiler-free.

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports

NO MERCY: Behind the Sci‑Fi Flop That Turned Into a Full-Blown Gossip Goldmine

Think Mercy is just “that Chris Pratt AI movie” everyone dragged online? Oh, sweet summer child. The real entertainment has been happening off-screen — between ripped pants, AI casting chaos, awkward co-star moments, and a backlash that turned one mid-budget thriller into the poster child for “Hollywood, what are you doing?”


On-Set Drama: Commando Chaos in the Death Scene

  • Chris Pratt turned Mercy into a family affair by casting his older brother Cully — an army vet and former cop — in a small security-guard role. Cute idea… until wardrobe got involved.
  • For a bloody death scene loaded with squibs, Cully was handed pants that were two sizes too small — and for reasons known only to the gods of chaos, he was going commando.
  • During a reshoot involving elevator doors and gunfire, the pants exploded more dramatically than any stunt: they ripped from the top of his butt crack to above his pubic area. Cully reportedly blurted, “Uhh, my dick’s out,” then had to lie there “dead” for minutes while the crew tried not to die laughing.
  • Chris told the story on Jimmy Kimmel Live, praising his brother for staying “method” and not breaking character even while accidentally flashing the set. That’s one way to make your big-screen debut.[1][2]

Cast Feuds & Awkward Energy: When Your Co‑Star Says “No” to Your Face

  • Fans expecting big sparks between Pratt and Rebecca Ferguson might be shocked to learn the pair hardly shared a room, let alone a scene.
  • YTYouTube·Rebecca Ferguson Said “No” to Working Face-to-Fa…
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7HxSxngap4
  • In a promo interview literally titled “Rebecca Ferguson Said ‘No’ to Working Face-to-Face with Chris Pratt,” Ferguson explains she chose to play AI judge Maddox mostly via screens and separate setups — meaning a lot of her performance was done away from Pratt, relying on tech and imagination instead of old-school scene work.[5]
  • Social media and fan groups picked up on a Radio Times blurb calling their first meeting for Mercy “a slightly awkward exchange,” fueling speculation that the two stars had… less than instant chemistry.
  • Officially, everyone’s professional and polite. Unofficially, fans have clocked that their on-camera promo vibe often feels friendlier than their actual screen dynamic — and the “she wouldn’t work face-to-face” headline did not help.

**Scandals & Controversies: Is Mercy Secretly AI Propaganda?**

  • Whatever message Mercy thought it was selling, critics and fans quickly rebranded it as the “AI propaganda movie.”
  • CBC torched the film as “absurdly stupid AI propaganda,” arguing that halfway through it stops being a cautionary tale and turns into “a bizarre PR campaign for AI,” with the judge framed as a kind of ChatGPT-with-a-soul who “has a heart of gold.”
  • The review skewers director Timur Bekmambetov as a tech obsessive with a “Dr. Evil-esque plan to infest Hollywood with AI actors and pump out 50 movies a year,” accusing Mercy of trying to make audiences comfortable with AI deciding life-and-death cases.[6]
  • Reddit threads piled on, calling the film “pro-AI and pro-surveillance” and mocking how the script bends over backwards to tell us “Human or AI, we all make mistakes. And we learn,” as if the robot judge is just a misunderstood sweetie.[6]

AI Casting Chaos: The Time Chris Pratt Nearly Replaced Rebecca Ferguson With a Bot

  • As if the propaganda talk wasn’t enough, Chris Pratt then admitted he’d once pitched an even more cursed idea: having an actual AI “actor” play Judge Maddox.
  • In early conversations, Pratt floated, “Should we have it be an AI, where the judge is actually AI, and we create an AI?”
  • According to him, the room immediately went, essentially, “Absolutely not.” Pratt now concedes, “Yeah, I don’t think that’s a good idea at all.”[3][4]
  • Another early, equally galaxy-brained thought: just putting a famous face like Oprah on the AI judge since it was “just a face on a screen.”[4]
  • The role ultimately went to Rebecca Ferguson — which, considering the dragging Mercy got for being “AI propaganda,” may be the only decision that didn’t age like milk.[3][4]

Wild Trivia & Fan Snark: The Internet Has No Mercy

  • Eight-Day Ferguson: Rebecca Ferguson has said she loved the idea of shooting Mercy in only eight days — a lightning-fast schedule for a studio sci-fi thriller. Fans on Reddit have since used that detail to explain… a lot.
  • Strap Me Down: Pratt has openly bragged that he insisted on being literally strapped into the Mercy chair for real, not faked restraints, to sell the intensity of the trial scenes. Audiences, however, mostly felt trapped alongside him.
  • Roasted in Real Time: The r/movies spoiler thread quickly devolved into a communal roast, with viewers calling it “one of the dumbest movies of the year” and mocking the villain twist as “Scooby-Doo-level” plotting.[8]
  • Historic Pratt Flop: On the business side, Mercy managed to unseat Avatar: Fire and Ash for a weekend but still delivered the worst opening of any Chris Pratt-led movie, limping in with a $11.2 million domestic debut. Ouch.

Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.