Skip to main content
Movie poster for “Wuthering Heights” (2026)

“Wuthering Heights”

“Come undone.”

2026
2h 16m
Director: Emerald Fennell
Play trailer

Overview

Tragedy strikes when Heathcliff falls in love with Catherine Earnshaw, a woman from a wealthy family in 18th-century England.

Cast

12 people

Reviews

2 min read

The Quotes Around the Moors

I knew exactly what kind of movie we were dealing with when Warner Bros. gently requested that critics refer to Emerald Fennell’s latest provocation with quotation marks. It’s not an adaptation of Emily Brontë’s 1847 novel; it's `"Wuthering Heights"`. The punctuation is a shield, a preemptive defense against the literary purists who might expect, I don't know, actual historical context or the second half of the book.

And maybe that's fair. Fennell isn’t interested in faithful translation. She’s interested in the sweat, the spit, and the sheer, chaotic spectacle of two terrible people who can't leave each other alone.

Cathy wandering the desolate, mist-covered moors

The opening scene plants a flag in the mud. We get a public hanging where a condemned man develops a post-mortem erection, a morbid anatomical reality that the crowd gawks at. But watch Cathy (played first by a younger actress, then by Margot Robbie).

She isn't horrified. She's fascinated. Delighted, even.

It’s a jarring, darkly funny intro that declares arousal and danger are essentially the same thing in this universe. Fennell (whose Saltburn already proved her affinity for sticky, bodily shock value) covers everything in a tactile grime—snail slime streaking a window, fresh pig blood staining a dress. The film desperately wants to feel dangerous.

Audience Opinions

Audience 6.1/10
"A lavish, erotically charged reimagining that dazzles the eyes but sharply divides viewers over its faithfulness, tone, and central romance."

Visual craft is widely acknowledged as impressive, with striking cinematography, detailed production design, and elaborate costumes creating a bold gothic sandbox for Emerald Fennell’s maximalist style. Reactions to the love story and performances are split: some are swept up by Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi’s intense dynamic and find the intimate scenes powerful, while others experience flat chemistry, misdirected acting, and a frustrating lack of emotional payoff. Readers of the novel are often angered by structural changes, heavy sexualization, and the softening of Heathcliff, whereas viewers less attached to the book are more likely to regard it as an intense, stylish, if uneven tragic romance.

What viewers praise
  • Striking visual style The film’s cinematography, bold color palette, and on-location moor landscapes create a vivid, cinematic gothic atmosphere that leaves strong impressions.
  • Opulent production design Elaborate sets and highly stylized interiors make the world feel immersive and distinctive, even when the story choices are contentious.
  • Memorable costume work Costumes are repeatedly singled out as gorgeous and imaginative, even when their historical accuracy is questioned.
  • Intense lead performances Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi are often praised for committing fully to their roles, with some viewers finding their chemistry fiery and emotionally raw.
  • Bold, provocative vision The unapologetically sexual, maximalist take on the material stands out as a daring reinterpretation that some viewers find emotionally overwhelming in a good way.
Common complaints
  • Radical changes to the novel Cutting the entire second half of the book, collapsing characters, and reshaping key dynamics leaves many who love the source feeling the story has been gutted.
  • Oversexualized treatment The emphasis on kink and S&M, including a graphic tone from the opening scenes, is seen as gratuitous and at odds with the original’s psychological darkness.
  • Uneven romance and chemistry A significant number of viewers detect little real spark between Robbie and Elordi, calling the central relationship dull or unconvincing despite the film’s erotic framing.
  • Shallow emotional impact Flashy, meme-ready moments and heightened sensuality are felt to come at the expense of depth, thematic complexity, and a satisfying conclusion.
  • Divisive character portrayals Heathcliff’s menace is softened into something more conventionally romantic, and several supporting characters are seen as miscast, underwritten, or distorted compared to their literary counterparts.
Recommended for
Stylish period romance seekers Emerald Fennell completists Margot Robbie admirers Jacob Elordi admirers Gothic melodrama enthusiasts Bold literary reinterpretation fans

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports

“Grave Desires & Codependent Co‑Stars”: All the Juiciest Real‑World Drama Behind Wuthering Heights (2026)

The Yorkshire moors are nothing compared to the chaos online. Between a near-riot over casting, a borderline-obsessive co-star bond, test screening drama, and a graveyard scene deemed too unhinged even for Emerald “Saltburn” Fennell, this movie has become 2026’s messiest period piece — and that’s saying something.


Scandals & Controversies: The Adaptation That Launched a Thousand Rants

Heathcliff, but Make Him Whiter?

Jacob Elordi’s casting as Heathcliff lit the internet on fire. Longtime Brontë readers pointed out that the novel describes Heathcliff as a “dark‑skinned gipsy,” a “little Lascar” and “as black as the wall behind him,” and argued the role should have gone to a person of color instead of a white Australian heartthrob. The debate quickly turned into full-blown whitewashing accusations across social media and think pieces .

Grown‑Ass Cathy

Margot Robbie stepping in as Catherine stirred its own storm. Cathy is canonically a teenager when she becomes “queen of the countryside” and marries Edgar; Robbie is nearly two decades older than that. Purists slammed the age gap as another sign the film was drifting away from Emily Brontë’s intent and into “hot, prestige fanfic” territory [2][4].

Casting Director Targeted With Death Threats

Things got ugly offline too. Casting director Kharmel Cochrane revealed that, amid the backlash, someone commented on Instagram that she should be shot over the casting decisions. She defended the film by saying this is art, not a documentary — but the vitriol underscored just how feral Brontë fandom can get when you mess with their moody king and queen [4].

“Pointless Destruction” or Bold Vision?

Critics lined up to drag Emerald Fennell, with one Spectator take calling her adaptation a “disturbing exercise in pointless destruction,” while commentators at outlets like Dazed questioned whether her glamorous, privileged background made her ill‑suited to handle such a raw, outsider text [4]. Fennell herself admitted she knew fans would be furious — and did it anyway.


Romance Rumors: The Margot & Jacob Obsession

Codependency on the Moors

Behind the scenes, Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi apparently went full Cathy-and-Heathcliff in emotional intensity, if not in actual scandal. Robbie has openly said she became “codependent” on Elordi during filming: she’d constantly look around set to see where he was and felt “unnerved and unmoored” the first time he wasn’t within sight, describing herself as “lost, like a kid without their blanket” .

“Mutual Obsession” & Being “Enamored”

Elordi did nothing to calm the rumor mill. He called their dynamic a “mutual obsession” and admitted he was “enamored” by Robbie, joking that if you get to share a set with her, you want to stay within five to ten feet at all times, watching everything “from how she drinks tea to how she eats her food” [3]. Not exactly subtle.

Flowers, Letters & Raised Eyebrows

Coverage of the controversy notes that Elordi reportedly wrote Robbie a love letter in character as Heathcliff, and filled her room with roses during the shoot — all while she remains married to producer Tom Ackerley [2]. The two insist the relationship is strictly platonic, but fans (and gossip columns) have treated it like a full‑blown fauxmance campaign, especially once paparazzi shots and red‑carpet body language started circulating [2][3].

It’s all unconfirmed as anything beyond very committed co‑star chemistry — but the internet has not exactly chosen chill.


Leaks & Secrets: The Scene Too Wild for Emerald Fennell

The “Insane” Jacob Elordi Scene That Got Axed

You thought Saltburn’s graveyard moment was the ceiling? Think again. Page Six reports that Wuthering Heights originally included an “insane Jacob Elordi scene” that ended up on the cutting‑room floor. Tipped as part of the grave/raunchy sequence, it was supposedly so out‑there that even Fennell decided it went too far for this already raunchy adaptation [1].

Toning Down Brontë’s Most Deranged Moment

In Brontë’s novel, Heathcliff literally opens Cathy’s coffin so their bodies can mingle in the grave. Instead of dialing up that unhinged energy, the film apparently tones it down: word is, the final cut has Heathcliff acting more like a tragic romantic lead — crying and cradling her body — rather than performing anything corpse-adjacent [1]. Given Fennell’s previous grave‑yard antics in Saltburn, fans expected the opposite, and gossip outlets framed the change as the film “wimping out” on its own shock‑value marketing [1][4].

Half the Book? Never Heard of Her

Fans also learned that Fennell carved away more than half the novel’s plot. Cathy’s death, which in the book happens mid‑story, is shoved to the very end; the whole second generation and frame narrative are essentially gone. Nelly and Edgar are retooled as more straightforward villains, and the film leans into a cleaner “two lovers torn apart by other people” arc [2]. Brontë purists call it a butchering; Fennell insists it’s the way the story felt to her at 14, not a page‑by‑page retelling [2].


Backlash, Test Screenings & Fan Fury

“Relentless” Hostility From Day One

The BBC straight‑up called the hostility “relentless,” tracing it back to the moment Fennell — known for provocative, flashy satires — announced she’d be tackling Wuthering Heights. From the first trailer, which leaned into sex, anachronistic music and glossy, modern aesthetics, fans accused Warner Bros. of turning a Gothic classic into a horny cosplay promo [4].

Frosty Test Screenings

Reports from August 2025 test screenings describe a “frosty reception”: viewers allegedly found the movie emotionally thin but overflowing with salacious detours and shock‑bait moments [4]. For some, it was too tame compared to the marketing; for others, it was gratuitous AND unfaithful — the worst of both worlds.

Brontë Fans vs. Fennell Stans

The culture war got so intense that Fennell herself admitted she’s such a Wuthering Heights obsessive that if someone else had made this version, she would probably have been furious. That quote only poured gasoline on the discourse, as fans accused her of gatekeeping the text while simultaneously ripping it apart [4].


Wild Trivia & Fan‑Fuel

Cathy Dies Last Now

Moving Cathy’s death to the finale completely rewires the story’s emotional logic, which critics and fans say turns a twisted, multi‑generational tragedy into something closer to a fever‑dream romance with villainous side characters [2]. It’s sparked endless thinkpieces and fan threads decoding what, exactly, Fennell is saying about obsession, class, and desire.

The “You Aren’t Ready” Endorsement

Early viewers like Anne Hathaway reportedly came out of advance screenings telling audiences they “aren’t ready” and should “consider [themselves] warned,” which only supercharged expectations and moral panic on both sides of the aisle [4].

Love it or loathe it, Wuthering Heights (2026) has managed something rare: turning a 19th‑century novel into 21st‑century gossip catnip. And if that “insane” graveyard scene ever leaks in full? Expect the fandom — and the moors — to absolutely combust.

Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.