George MacKay
Nick Dyer
Overview
Two desperate men take jobs aboard an old fishing boat that mysteriously reappears after vanishing 30 years before. But when they return from their voyage, why is nothing as they remember it?
Cast
12 people
Reviews
4 min read AI-generated editorial review
The Sea Remembers What We Forget
I keep thinking about the way water holds things. Not just the obvious—ships, bodies, lost keys—but the intangible: voices, promises, the exact shade of a summer sky from thirty years ago. Mark Jenkin’s Rose of Nevada understands this better than most films. It’s a ghost story that doesn’t need specters to haunt you.
The premise is deceptively simple: two men, played by George MacKay and Callum Turner, take jobs on a fishing boat that vanished three decades earlier, only to return with its crew long dead and the world slightly… off. But Jenkin isn’t interested in explaining the mechanics of this slippage. He’s after something quieter, more insidious—the way time doesn’t just pass but erodes, leaving behind a residue that clings to skin and memory.
Jenkin shot Rose of Nevada on 16mm, and the grain isn’t just a stylistic choice—it’s a character. The film feels like it’s been pulled from the ocean itself, salt-crusted and warped by the elements. Colors bleed into one another, as if the past and present are literally running together. In one scene, MacKay’s character, Tom, stares at his reflection in a puddle, and for a moment, the water doesn’t ripple. It’s as if the surface has forgotten how to move. That’s the film in a nutshell: a world that’s stopped obeying the rules, not with a bang but a slow, creeping dread.
The performances are all physicality. MacKay, who’s made a career of playing men on the edge (see: 1917, The Banshees of Inisherin), here burrows into something more internal. His Tom is a man who carries his tension in his shoulders, as if he’s bracing for a blow that never comes. Turner’s Danny is looser, more volatile—his hands never still, always reaching for something just out of grasp. Their dynamic is the film’s emotional core: two men orbiting each other, drawn together by curiosity and repelled by the unspoken fear that they might not be the same people who set out.
I keep thinking about the way water holds things. Not just the obvious—ships, bodies, lost keys—but the intangible: voices, promises, the exact shade of a summer sky from thirty years ago. Mark Jenkin’s Rose of Nevada understands this better than most films. It’s a ghost story that doesn’t need specters to haunt you.
The premise is deceptively simple: two men, played by George MacKay and Callum Turner, take jobs on a fishing boat that vanished three decades earlier, only to return with its crew long dead and the world slightly… off. But Jenkin isn’t interested in explaining the mechanics of this slippage. He’s after something quieter, more insidious—the way time doesn’t just pass but erodes, leaving behind a residue that clings to skin and memory.
Jenkin shot Rose of Nevada on 16mm, and the grain isn’t just a stylistic choice—it’s a character. The film feels like it’s been pulled from the ocean itself, salt-crusted and warped by the elements. Colors bleed into one another, as if the past and present are literally running together. In one scene, MacKay’s character, Tom, stares at his reflection in a puddle, and for a moment, the water doesn’t ripple. It’s as if the surface has forgotten how to move. That’s the film in a nutshell: a world that’s stopped obeying the rules, not with a bang but a slow, creeping dread.
The performances are all physicality. MacKay, who’s made a career of playing men on the edge (see: 1917, The Banshees of Inisherin), here burrows into something more internal. His Tom is a man who carries his tension in his shoulders, as if he’s bracing for a blow that never comes. Turner’s Danny is looser, more volatile—his hands never still, always reaching for something just out of grasp. Their dynamic is the film’s emotional core: two men orbiting each other, drawn together by curiosity and repelled by the unspoken fear that they might not be the same people who set out.
Full Plot (Spoilers)
AI-generated full plot summary Loading…
Buzz & Rumors
Public reports AI-researched entertainment notes
Mark Jenkin’s Rose of Nevada Drops Supernatural Chills on Cornish Shores
Mark Jenkin, the filmmaker behind the critically adored Bait (2019), is back with Rose of Nevada—a 2026 supernatural drama that promises to blend eerie folklore with his signature grainy, atmospheric style. Starring George MacKay (1917, The Banshees of Inisherin) and Callum Turner (The Capture, War & Peace), the film is already generating buzz for its haunting premise and Jenkin’s unconventional approach to storytelling.
A Ghost Ship Washes Ashore in Cornwall
The plot centers on the mysterious reappearance of a long-lost fishing vessel in a remote Cornish coastal village 
. Two locals, played by MacKay and Turner, investigate the boat’s sudden return, uncovering unsettling secrets tied to the sea and the community’s past. While details remain scarce, early descriptions suggest a slow-burn horror-drama with supernatural undertones, leaning into Jenkin’s fascination with rural isolation and folklore [4].
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcUbMz74kE8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V93RYI6erPo
The film’s title, Rose of Nevada, has sparked curiosity—it’s unclear whether it refers to a character, a symbolic motif, or a red herring. Jenkin, known for his cryptic narratives, hasn’t clarified its meaning, leaving fans to speculate [6][9].
Jenkin’s Signature Style: Grit and Ghosts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzA3bqranw0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnADZMM0Gm8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8PkOChQc4Y
Jenkin’s films are defined by their tactile, almost analog aesthetic—Bait was famously shot on 16mm black-and-white film, giving it a raw, timeless quality. Early clips and trailers for Rose of Nevada suggest a similar approach, with muted colors, handheld camerawork, and an emphasis on natural soundscapes [1][5][8]. In a conversation with Kodak, Jenkin hinted at his process, describing the film as a "meditation on place and memory," though he avoided spoiling specifics [6].
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLAydJKIvO0
The director’s collaboration with cinematographer Simon Tindall (who also worked on Bait) likely plays a key role in shaping the film’s visual identity. Jenkin’s preference for non-professional actors alongside seasoned performers—like Mary Woodvine (The Witcher) and Adrian Rawlins (Harry Potter)—adds to the film’s grounded, unsettling realism [3][7].
MacKay and Turner Lead a Haunting Ensemble
George MacKay and Callum Turner, both rising stars in British cinema, take center stage as the villagers drawn into the mystery. Their on-screen chemistry has been teased in exclusive clips, where their characters’ initial curiosity curdles into dread [1][5]. The supporting cast includes Francis Magee (Game of Thrones), Edward Rowe (Bait), and Rosalind Eleazar (The Personal History of David Copperfield), rounding out a ensemble that feels deeply rooted in Jenkin’s world [3].
Rumors suggest the film’s tone balances psychological tension with moments of outright horror, though Jenkin has downplayed expectations of jump scares. Instead, he’s described Rose of Nevada as a "ghost story for people who don’t like ghost stories," focusing on atmosphere over cheap thrills [9].
Release and Reception: What We Know So Far
Rose of Nevada is slated for a 2026 release, though no exact date has been confirmed. Early reactions from industry screenings are reportedly positive, with critics praising its moody cinematography and MacKay’s performance [3]. However, with Jenkin’s films often defying genre conventions, it’s unclear whether the film will lean into arthouse drama or wider commercial appeal.
One thing’s certain: Jenkin’s latest won’t be a straightforward horror flick. As he told FLC Luminaries, "I’m more interested in the things that linger than the things that scream" [9]. For fans of Bait and Enys Men, that’s an enticing promise.
Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.
Movies
Similar Movies
Related titles ranked by rating and popularity.
Apocalypse Now
1979 • Movie
Donnie Darko
2001 • Movie
Twelve Monkeys
1995 • Movie
Planet of the Apes
1968 • Movie
8 Mile
2002 • Movie
Blue Velvet
1986 • Movie
A History of Violence
2005 • Movie
Videodrome
1983 • Movie
Jarhead
2005 • Movie
Bad Education
2004 • Movie
2046
2004 • Movie
Nimic
2020 • Movie