Skip to main content
Movie poster for Downsizing (2017)

Downsizing

“We are meant for something bigger.”

2017
2h 15m
Play trailer

Overview

A kindly occupational therapist undergoes a new procedure to be shrunken to four inches tall so that he and his wife can help save the planet and afford a nice lifestyle at the same time.

Cast

12 people

Reviews

Andre Gonzales

Really weird and pointless movie. He decides to become small but then that's pretty much it. After he has the operation there's really nothing else interesting about the movie after that. I give it a 4 just cause the Vietnamize lady had me cracking up.

Read full review

Audience Opinions

Audience 5.8/10
"An inventive shrinking satire that starts strong but drifts into a muddled, unfocused story held up mostly by its supporting cast."

The early world-building around the downsizing procedure, the visual gimmick of tiny lives, and a standout performance from Hong Chau earn real admiration, with Christoph Waltz often cited as another bright spot. Once the initial premise is set up, the plot splinters into disparate threads, pacing bogs down, and the tone lurches between quirky comedy, social drama, and end-of-the-world parable, leaving the overall experience feeling like wasted potential rather than a cohesive sci‑fi gem.

What viewers praise
  • Intriguing sci‑fi concept The idea of shrinking humans to solve economic and environmental problems is seen as clever, original, and full of possibilities.
  • Hong Chau standout Her character energizes the film and is often remembered as the emotional center, even when viewers are divided on the way she is written and voiced.
  • Charismatic supporting roles Christoph Waltz and other side characters add color, humor, and personality that keep later stretches from completely stalling.
  • Entertaining first act The setup, including the procedure and adaptation to tiny life, is viewed as engaging, funny, and visually imaginative.
  • Interesting social themes Attempts to address consumerism, class, and environmental collapse give the film more intellectual heft than a simple high‑concept comedy.
Common complaints
  • Wasted potential A widely praised premise never gets a satisfying payoff, with big ideas introduced and then barely explored.
  • Messy, disjointed narrative The story is often described as feeling like two or three different movies stitched together, wandering from one focus to another without a clear throughline.
  • Tonally all over the place Marketing led viewers to expect a broad comedy, but the film leans into slow, sometimes preachy drama, creating a jarring shift in expectations.
  • Bland main character Matt Damon's role is frequently labeled passive or dull, making it hard to invest in his journey compared with the more vivid side characters.
  • Pacing and length issues The film feels overlong and meandering, introducing late-game apocalypse stakes and subplots that then fizzle out without real impact.
Recommended for
High-concept sci‑fi dramedy fans Hong Chau admirers Christoph Waltz fans Offbeat social satire seekers Alexander Payne followers Curious Matt Damon completionists

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports

Shrunk Egos & Oversized Drama: The Real Tea Behind Downsizing (2017)

When Downsizing promised to make Matt Damon five inches tall, nobody mentioned the off‑screen scandal that would blow up to IMAX size. From Matt getting semi‑canceled mid‑press tour to a “racist caricature” debate and a behind‑the‑scenes money tug‑of‑war, this supposedly gentle sci‑fi satire had more drama than its own third act.


Scandals & Controversies: When Promo Went Nuclear

Matt Damon’s #MeToo “Spectrum” Comments Blew Up the Press Tour

While flogging Downsizing, Damon gave an ABC News interview musing that there’s a “spectrum of behavior” in sexual misconduct and that not all offenses are equal. The internet, already at a rolling boil in late 2017, considered this… not the moment. Social media torched him, with high‑profile critics like Alyssa Milano and Minnie Driver (yes, his Good Will Hunting co‑star) publicly calling him out for being tone‑deaf .

So He Skipped His Own Premiere

Right as the backlash crescendoed, Damon suddenly pulled out of the Los Angeles red‑carpet premiere. Officially it was due to a “family matter” (his father was reportedly ill), but the timing meant every outlet framed it as “Damon ducks premiere amid misconduct comment backlash” [1]. His co‑stars walked the carpet without him while fielding questions about his quotes—Kristen Wiig called the situation “delicate,” Laura Dern pleaded for less social‑media bullying, and Hong Chau politely swerved back to talking about her role [1].


Representation Firestorm: Hong Chau, Accents & “Racist Caricature” Claims

The Breakout Performance That Sparked a Think‑Piece War

Hong Chau’s Ngoc Lan Tran—a Vietnamese refugee, political activist, amputee and cleaning‑lady‑turned-moral-compass—earned her a Golden Globe nomination and major awards buzz. But a chunk of critics absolutely hated how the character was presented. ScreenCrush’s E. Oliver Whitney branded her an “icky, racist caricature,” and RogerEbert.com’s Brian Tallerico called the film “casually racist” for leaning on a heavily accented immigrant cleaner as basically the only major character of color .

Chau Wasn’t Here for Respectability Politics

Instead of backing off, Chau doubled down. She told Bustle she refused to sand down the accent or “tone down” Ngoc Lan’s abrupt, funny, sometimes abrasive energy just to make white viewers more comfortable. “I’m more interested in broadening what good representations of Asians is rather than narrowing it,” she said, adding, “I don’t want to somehow criminalize Asian characters with accents… that doesn’t seem like progress to me” [2]. As for people potentially mimicking her character? “Not enough of a reason for me to not perform the character fully” [2]. In other words: she knew exactly what she was doing—and she was not apologizing.

Festival Buzz: Applause + Side‑Eye

At early festival screenings, buzz was weirdly split. On one side: raves about Chau stealing the film. On the other: hushed “problematic” mutterings and Twitter threads about whether the role crossed into stereotype, which Salon later framed as viewers revealing their own bias and discomfort with immigrant accents more than anything Chau actually did [2].


Backstage Power Plays: Budgets, Cold Feet & a “Poached” Matt Damon

The Movie That Nearly Got Downsized Into Oblivion

Alexander Payne didn’t just make his biggest film conceptually—Downsizing was also his priciest ever. Early versions were floated at close to $100 million, eventually hammered down to around $70 million, and that number alone made prestige‑indie darlings clutch their pearls . Fox Searchlight passed outright [3].

Megan Ellison Goes Radio‑Silent, Brad Grey Goes Rogue

Annapurna Pictures’ Megan Ellison originally agreed to bankroll the film at that $70 million level… then reportedly started getting cold feet and literally stopped taking calls from Paramount boss Brad Grey as costs, effects and scale loomed [3]. Grey, not exactly known for timidity, just greenlit the movie anyway without getting Ellison fully back on board—a studio‑politics move people in town gossiped about for months [3].

Matt Damon “Poached” from Manchester by the Sea

The juiciest bit: Damon had long wanted to work with Payne. When Downsizing finally came together, he was already attached to star in Manchester by the Sea. Payne called; Damon bailed on starring in Manchester and slid over to Downsizing, staying on Manchester only as a producer [3]. Then, in a real “are you kidding me?” twist, the money for Downsizing briefly fell through after he left, delaying the project by about a year [3]. Cue industry whispers about Damon backing the wrong horse: Manchester goes on to become an Oscar magnet, while Downsizing… does not.


**Leaks, Cuts & Fan Obsessions: The Franken‑Edit of *Downsizing***

From Three Hours to 2h15m: What Got Shrunken in the Edit

According to Payne’s own recounting, the first cut of Downsizing ran roughly three hours. He and longtime editor Kevin Tent then hacked away for about a year to get it down to around 135 minutes [3]. Fans on Reddit have long argued this explains why the movie feels like three different films duct‑taped together: a suburban comedy, a mini‑people satire, and a doomsday environmental drama .

The “My Shoulders Made the Movie” Extra

One Facebook‑posting extra joked that, after closer inspection, two of his three scenes technically made the cut—but only his shoulders are visible in both . If you’ve ever felt downsized at work, try being literally cropped out of existence.

Redditors Dig Through Deleted Scenes

Fans who grabbed the DVD have confirmed that there are deleted scenes included, but the consensus in threads is that a lot more must have been cut, especially around the late‑movie apocalypse subplot and the Norwegian commune [4][5]. A popular fan stance: the film had “a ton of ideas but no idea what to do with them,” and the brutal trim job only made it feel more chaotic [5].


Wild Trivia & What‑Could‑Have‑Beens

Alternate Leads & Almost‑Audreys

Before Damon locked in, Payne reportedly considered his Sideways muse Paul Giamatti for the lead [3]. For the wife, Reese Witherspoon was in the conversation, but scheduling killed that version and Kristen Wiig ultimately took the role [3]. Somewhere in the multiverse, there’s a Downsizing with Giamatti and Witherspoon quietly winning Oscars in dollhouses.

Most Difficult Film of Payne’s Career

Payne has flat‑out called Downsizing the most difficult film he’s ever made, largely because of the complex, often invisible visual effects. One example: to sell a shot of a “normal‑sized” person carrying a box with two shrunken humans inside, the team had to film the actor with an empty box, digitally track it, build a giant motion‑controlled version of that box, shoot the “tiny” actors in it against greenscreen, then composite the whole Frankenstein together [3]. All that… for a gag where Matt Damon is very, very small.


Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.