Skip to main content

Overview

Born under unusual circumstances, Benjamin Button springs into being as an elderly man in a New Orleans nursing home and ages in reverse. Twelve years after his birth, he meets Daisy, a child who flits in and out of his life as she grows up to be a dancer. Though he has all sorts of unusual adventures over the course of his life, it is his relationship with Daisy, and the hope that they will come together at the right time, that drives Benjamin forward.

Cast

12 people

Reviews

talisencrw

One of Fincher's masterworks--though I like others better. He's definitely one of the only people alive who could have succeeded with this very intriguing story. There are moments--when Benjamin's coming into his own, both with Tilda Swinton's character and with Cate Blanchett's--that are amongst the finest and most invigorating I have ever seen in cinema. I'm curious how I'll find it when I rewatch it in a few years. I have the impression that as I come to terms with age and gather more wisdom in my own skin, this story will only grow in my heart and appreciation--for both the highs and the lows. That is a spectacular magic trick for a movie to do--and Fincher's downright full of them.

Read full review

Unknownian

This movie is in my top 10 movie list in life. It is a cinema achievement that may never be outdone by 'anyone'. Considering that this masterpiece was shot digitally in 2007, it is miles above any CG effort since. For those of you that haven't seen it: "SEE IT". Besides a great story (with one flaw), this film makes illusion and simulation become reality. The one flaw: I have great respect for David Fincher, and I am going to go out on a limb and say that he must have been aware of this discrepancy, but went ahead with the story-line as written anyway. ( I hope that's the case). Benjamin Button was born "old", and regressed backwards to die an infant. The flaw in the story-line (and it's a big one), is that as he regresses to youth, he begins to have dementia (Alzheimer's symptoms), along with all of the arthritic pains and problems an old man gets as he ages. At the end, before he dies he loses his memory completely. Logically, since he was born an old man, those illnesses should have evolved from birth, and improved as he regressed in age. Strangely in the film, he is born with severe arthritis, and can't even walk until he is 7. Why then would he again experience these same symptoms as a child on the way to his death bed (or crib)? He should be in perfect health as a child, and regress to a "fetus", and then disappear. Other than that major flaw, this movie is a 10. Unfortunately because of the illogical way he dies, I had to give it a 9 out of 10 stars. One other issue with the plot: If we were to take this movie scenario and try to place it in the real world, Benjamin would have to have been born a "full sized", old man, and then after 70 or 80 years, he would have begun to shrink. Since the idea of a woman giving birth to a full sized man is physically impossible, our Benjamin had to be born old and "tiny". This of course is another contradiction in the plot, since Benjamin is small "twice in his life". We can't dwell on this flaw at all, because if we did we would never get passed it. To enjoy this movie, we must put all the facts and logistics of this scenario aside, and when we do, this movie takes us on a journey unlike any other ever filmed.

Read full review

CinemaSerf

A baby is abandoned by his petrified parents when it is born with all the features of an elderly man. Fortunately, he finds a home with the caring "Queenie" (Taraji P. Henson) who is somewhat adept at looking after seniors - just not ones this tiny. It doesn't take "Benjamin" long to assume a more adult size but he still exhibits all the frailties of a disablingly arthritic old age whilst having the emotional maturity of a bairn. They all realise that as he gets older, he will get younger until eventually he will regress back into infancy and then essentially die of young age - assuming fate doesn't intervene in the meantime. Had he had the benefits of the presumed wisdom of his years at the start, then his life might have been different but he was learning in reverse and so was for a long time very dependent on "Queenie", her beau "Tizzy" (Mahershala Ali) and his fellow residents at the care come. All of what happens now is narrated by "Caroline" (Julia Ormond) who is reading his diary to her ailing mother and his long term best friend "Daisy" (Cate Blanchett) and as their stories interveave across the better part of a century it also quite effectively mirrors so much of the evolution of the United States during a time from the end of the Great War until the deadly hurricane "Katrina" descended upon an ill-prepared New Orleans. The make up artists have done sterling work turning Brad Pitt from an elderly gent (whom I did think looked more like Mark Hamill) to an handsome young charmer who falls in love with the younger "Daisy" but who is terrified that should they have a child, it might end up just like him! There isn't a continuous narrative for any of his relationships or friendships which makes this much more interesting than just being a straight chronology but as she reads and we listen, we learn of a troubled soul with plenty to give if only nature and nurture can reconcile long enough for him to learn to trust and be trusted. Trying to get a couple of hours from this original F. Scott Fitzgerald short story was always going to be an ask, but with both Pitt and Henson, especially, delivering at their most characterful; the usually rather aloof Blanchett imbuing her character with a surprising degree of engaging vulnerability as their love blossoms and the sparingly used Ormond adding something really quite emotional as the pennies drop as she reads this book, David Fincher has crafted something remarkably human for us here. The production design convinces well as the clock ticks backwards and forwards - depending on who you are, and the Alexandre Desplat score augments a very stylish story that does tug at the heart strings occasionally, but that is mercifully devoid of much sentimentality as the inevitable conclusion looms ever larger for a "Daisy" for whom roles are now reversing. There's everything from war to romance in here, and it's well worth a watch on a big screen if you can.

Read full review

Audience Opinions

Audience 7.8/10
"A lavish, contemplative life story built around a unique backwards-aging conceit, moving for many but too slow and emotionally distant for others."

The film’s unusual premise, emotional focus on time, loss, and love, and the central relationship between Benjamin and Daisy resonate strongly, especially when paired with rich visuals and careful period detail. At the same time, the nearly three-hour runtime, gentle pacing, and a protagonist perceived as passive or hollow leave a significant number of viewers unmoved, and some find the digital aging effects distracting or uncanny.

What viewers praise
  • Powerful emotional themes The story’s focus on mortality, impermanence, and cherishing fleeting moments hits hard for those who connect with it.
  • Distinctive core concept The idea of a man aging backwards is seen as an original, thought-provoking way to explore an entire life.
  • Rich visual atmosphere Elegant cinematography, period settings, and meticulous craft make the film visually absorbing.
  • Engaging central romance The evolving relationship between Benjamin and Daisy provides the heart of the story and delivers several memorable, affecting scenes.
  • Memorable lines and ending Philosophical quotes and the bittersweet final stretch leave a lingering emotional impression.
Common complaints
  • Slow, drawn-out pacing The long runtime and measured storytelling style feel draggy, with stretches that are described as boring or inert.
  • Limited emotional connection Despite the heavy themes, some viewers feel strangely untouched, finding the overall effect polished but hollow.
  • Uneven visual effects The digital aging work is admired in concept but occasionally lands in uncanny territory and pulls attention away from the drama.
  • Passive main character Benjamin’s lack of strong personality or clear inner life makes it hard for some to invest in his journey.
  • Overly sentimental tone Certain dramatic beats and voiceover reflections are perceived as over-melodramatic or manipulative rather than genuinely earned.
Recommended for
Melancholic romance seekers Life-spanning epic drama fans Contemplative fantasy enthusiasts David Fincher film collectors Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett fans Visually driven story lovers

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports

**The Messy, Marvelous, Real-Life Drama Behind *The Curious Case of Benjamin Button***

He aged backwards, but the drama around him was very much real-time. From plagiarism accusations to studio showdowns and icy “romance,” here’s the juiciest off‑screen gossip orbiting Brad Pitt’s time-bending epic.


**Scandals & Lawsuits: The Legal Case of Benjamin Button**

  • An Italian office worker, Adriana Pichini, went full main-character energy and filed a court case in 2009 claiming the film’s screenplay was based on a story she wrote in 1994 without permission or credit. CBC covered the suit under the very on‑brand headline “The legal case of Benjamin Button” , while The New York Times summarized her lawyer’s allegation that the movie lifted key elements from her unpublished work .
  • The original F. Scott Fitzgerald short story exists, of course, but Pichini argued the screenplay’s structure and details were closer to hers than to Fitzgerald’s.
  • The outcome? Publicly, it all went very quiet—no splashy trial, no explosive verdict. Rumor-wise, fans generally assume it was quietly resolved or went nowhere, but that’s speculation; only the initial filings and coverage are on record.
  • On the gossipier end of the legal spectrum, TMZ clocked that Jared Harris (tattooed tugboat king Captain Mike) filed for divorce right as the movie’s awards push was ramping up, citing “irreconcilable differences” in legal papers . No one tied it directly to the shoot, but the timing had tabloid-watchers side‑eyeing the red carpet smiles.

Power Plays & Studio Drama

  • David Fincher vs. Paramount became its own behind‑the‑scenes soap. With a massive reported budget in the $150 million range, insiders described “small-ish drama” between the director and the studio over costs and control .
  • The Playlist reported “talk and rumors” of friction surrounding the production, hinting that Fincher’s famously exacting style and the film’s experimental tech were giving the finance people ulcers [3].
  • Reddit box‑office nerds later dissected how a $150m romantic fantasy from the Se7en guy ever got greenlit, with one thread describing the film as the one kind of big, sentimental prestige picture Fincher struggles to sell to his usual fans .
  • The long road to screen only fed the mythos: essays on the film’s “curious development history” note how many years it kicked around before Fincher finally got his version made [4]. Fans on forums often frame the whole project as a passion‑powered tug of war between auteur ambition and studio nerves.

Cast Feuds, Chemistry & Awards-Season Shade

  • For a sweeping love story, fans have been… ruthless about Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett’s onscreen connection.
  • One review bluntly slammed the “total lack of chemistry between Pitt and Blanchett,” arguing that while Pitt is strong as Benjamin, the central romance feels emotionally undercooked .
  • A r/Fauxmoi thread on “worst chemistry in movies/series” saw multiple posters drag Button, with one user saying that for a love story “that crossed the boundaries of time, they had as little spark as in a morgue” . Ouch.
  • Meanwhile, Lainey Gossip went full snark during Oscar season, calling Benjamin Button “a good movie, sure… but great?” and blasting the Academy for showering it with 13 nominations when it felt, to her, like prestige packaging on familiar material .
  • In another piece, Lainey pointed out how closely the film mirrors Forrest Gump—sentimental life‑journey, Southern setting, strong mama, big historical backdrops—hinting that voters were falling for a formula they’d already rewarded once [2][9].

Copycat Claims: The “Forrest Gump with Merlin Sickness” Debate

  • The Forrest Gump comparisons got so loud they practically became their own sub-gossip.
  • The Christian college paper The Chimes dubbed Benjamin Button a “darker ‘Forrest Gump’,” pointing out near‑parallel story beats and archetypes .
  • On Reddit, a popular thread outright asked if Button was “basically a rip off of Forrest Gump,” with one user memorably describing it as “Forrest Gump except instead of the main character being mentally disabled he had Merlin sickness” .
  • Screenwriter Eric Roth—who, oh-so-coincidentally, wrote both films—has chatted in interviews about being drawn to big, sweeping life narratives and adapting Button with that same epic, milestone‑driven structure . He doesn’t deny the echoes; he just leans into his preferred sandbox.

VFX Witchcraft & Deleted Scenes: The Tech Gossip

  • IGInstagram·Brad talking about The Curious Case Of Benjamin …
    https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6jPlhkOR6V/?hl=en
  • The beauty tax was brutal. Instagram behind‑the‑scenes posts and interviews reveal Brad Pitt was clocking roughly five hours a day in the makeup chair to sell Benjamin’s many stages of life [12].
  • Reddit’s r/MovieDetails spilled an extra layer of digital sorcery: everyone knows Brad’s head was CG‑replaced on different bodies, but FX artists quietly did similar head‑replacement work on Cate Blanchett to age and de‑age Daisy convincingly in certain scenes . Fans have since freeze‑framed those moments like it’s the Zapruder film.
  • Vanity Fair gleefully ran a piece on seven deleted scenes, teasing moments that didn’t make the final cut—like an alternate early sequence of baby‑Benjamin being abandoned on stairs that played differently from the final version . Physical media diehards still grumble that some of those trims deserve an extended cut.

Fan Theories, Metaphors & Big-Brain Speculation

  • One of the most viral Reddit theories reframes the entire movie as a symbolic portrait of Alzheimer’s disease. On r/FanTheories, a widely shared post argues that Benjamin’s backwards body and forward‑moving mind mirror the way Alzheimer’s strips away memories and selfhood over time .
  • Fans point to Benjamin’s late‑stage confusion and loss of recognition as eerily similar to accounts of dementia patients, turning the film from “sad romance” into “secret illness narrative.”
  • TV Tropes’ wild mass guessing page for Button pushes further, with fans suggesting, for instance, that Benjamin might be the reincarnation of Mr. Gateaux’s son (the man who built the backwards clock), symbolically “reversing time” to bring his boy back . Totally unconfirmed, purely fan‑driven—but deliciously on‑brand for a movie obsessed with clocks and fate.

Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.