Skip to main content
Movie poster for Roald Dahl's The Witches (2020)

Roald Dahl's The Witches

“Witches are real!”

2020
1h 44m
Director: Robert Zemeckis
Play trailer

Overview

In late 1967, a young orphaned boy goes to live with his loving grandma in the rural Alabama town of Demopolis. As the boy and his grandmother encounter some deceptively glamorous but thoroughly diabolical witches, she wisely whisks him away to a seaside resort. Regrettably, they arrive at precisely the same time that the world's Grand High Witch has gathered.

Cast

12 people

Reviews

TinyLilRobot

A lot was changed in this remake and I thought it would irk me. After about twenty minutes I thought I had been wrong, the opening had some originality and it seemed like something fresh. then they arrived at the Hotel and Anne Hathaway came on the scene like a wrecking ball. Any potential that this movie had was suffocated by Hathaways incredibly poor performance. Watch Anjelica Huston's performance in the original and you will see the MASSIVE difference in ability. Hathaway's performance is akin to an amateur impressionist. It feel more like an insult than an homage by Hathaway, she put zero effort or spirit into this character. Her accent is atrocious and her presence is almost nonexistent. Also the CGI already looks cheap, c'mon they had better puppets in the 80's. All witches now have joker smiles and shark teeth? This could've really been a good movie and it is just marred by an extremely poor performance from the lead villain, an overuse of cheap effects, poor pacing, lack of originality in the second half and a horrendous ending. The only highlights of this movie are Octavia Spencer and Jahzir Bruno who do a fantastic job of filling and updating their roles. Unfortunately as most fans know, Jahzir spends the second half of the movie as a poorly CGI'd mouse. Leaving Octavia Spencer to carry the entirety of the movie from there on out almost seems like a cruel prank. Tucci is decent as is Codie Eastwick as Bruno but there characters are so poorly written and used they practically add nothing. The addition of a third mouse is also meaningless and changes nothing in the story. Ultimately this movie is a far worse version of the first one. They actually managed to tell less of the story, give characters less development, and have worse effects than a movie made over 30 years ago. Some of this may have been forgivable if they added any decent original concepts but again this is a poor retread with no added substance. Its disheartening to see so many big names attached to this film. Guillermo Del Toro should not put this on his IMBD page. Of course your children will like it, they like Peppa Pig.

Read full review

SWITCH.

When you hear the names Robert Zemeckis, Guillermo del Toro and Alfonso Cuaron, you expect something visually engaging. These three names paired with Dahl's work could have been something really special, but this is just another bland adaption. The more you compare it to both the source material and previous adaptions, it comes across as bland and missing the mark. The same could be said about the star-studded cast led by Hathaway and Octavia Spencer, with Stanley Tucci playing the forgettable hotel owner. This team really could have made something unique, but this is not it, witch. - Chris dos Santos Read Chris' full article... https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-the-witches-horrifying-for-all-the-wrong-reasons

Read full review

MihaiADobre

Is a good movie for family. The end is unexpected and Anne Hatheway is always a good choice in distribution.

Read full review

Dark Jedi

Unlike what a lot of people seems to think about this movie I though it was a fairly decent family movie. It’s not great but decent enough. I quite enjoyed it at least. The story is what it is. It is a Roald Dahl story so it is somewhat dark but funny and with some light at the same time. Of course there are a bunch of whiners complaining that it is too dark and not suited for children. Well, everyone knows (or should now) what to expect from a Roald Dahl story so just go and see another movie then. My kids, even when they where younger, would have no problem with this movie. But then I would spend the time to watch it with them. It is called parenting. The beginning felt a wee bit slow perhaps but once the grand witch, and in particular the three mice, entered the scene it became rather funny. The one thing I did not like that much was the over the top silly acting of the witches, especially the grand witch. They could really have toned down that it bit to make her a bit more scary. Now she just became silly and somewhat annoying. The special effects were quite nice. The mice was a bit cartoonish but that was okay for this movie. I quite liked how the grand witch’s mouth split open from time to time to reveal her “witchiness”. Apparently a bunch of disability advocates, including British Paralympic swimmer Amy Marren, got unhinged and claimed the movie was “perpetuating bias against individuals with ectrodactyly and other limb differences.” Seriously? Get a grip. It is fiction and a family movie about witches for Christ sake! Presenting witches or other supernatural creatures as having “abnormalities” like crows feet, fangs and God knows what is what makes witches. If these obsessive whiners and cancel culture freaks would have their way no movie worth watching and no book worth reading would ever be made. Anyway, I felt it was an hour and 45 minutes that I enjoyed.

Read full review

misubisu

A thoroughly entertaining movie... way better than I was expecting after reading the reviews. I loved Ann Hathaway's portrayal of the Grand High Witch. She really threw herself into the role. Not really a kids movie, as it's a little dark... but definitely a good watch!

Read full review

Audience Opinions

Audience 5.3/10
"A lively but uneven remake with enjoyable performances buried under clunky CGI and an awkward tone that struggles to satisfy either kids or adults."

Octavia Spencer’s warm presence and Anne Hathaway’s gleefully over-the-top Grand High Witch are frequently singled out as the most entertaining parts, giving the story some charm and campy fun. At the same time, the heavy use of weak-looking CGI, a tone that swings between goofy and genuinely disturbing, and constant comparisons to the 1990 adaptation leave many feeling this version is watchable but forgettable.

What viewers praise
  • Octavia Spencer’s warmth Her caring, no-nonsense grandmother is praised as the emotional anchor and one of the most engaging elements.
  • Entertaining villain performance Anne Hathaway’s exaggerated, campy take on the Grand High Witch is seen as wildly fun and memorable by those who enjoy big performances.
  • Fun, campy moments Several viewers find the humor, over-the-top set pieces, and some goofy sequences surprisingly funny and enjoyable.
  • Decent family Halloween pick For families with older kids, it works as light, spooky entertainment with a playful dark-fantasy vibe.
Common complaints
  • Weak CGI effects The overreliance on computer-generated mice, transformations, and gags is widely viewed as cheap-looking and distracting.
  • Tone too intense for kids Creature designs, body horror touches, and some genuinely scary scenes are described as overly frightening for younger children.
  • Inferior to 1990 version Comparisons almost always favor the earlier film, with this remake seen as less magical, less creepy, and lacking personality.
  • Divisive overacting Hathaway’s big performance that some enjoy is dismissed by others as grating, with the narration and moralizing scenes also feeling forced.
  • Generic, forgettable story Beyond the performances, the plot and emotional beats are often described as bland and not especially moving or imaginative.
Recommended for
Family-friendly dark fantasy seekers Octavia Spencer fans Anne Hathaway completists Light Halloween movie night Roald Dahl adaptation collectors

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports

Secrets, Spells & Sorry-Not-Sorry: The Messy Real-World Drama Behind Roald Dahl’s The Witches (2020)

When you remake a beloved nightmare fuel classic, you hope the scariest thing is the prosthetics. For The Witches (2020), the real horror show was off-screen: secret pregnancies, PR firestorms, and a disappearing act from streaming. Grab your potions — this coven came with chaos.


Scandals & Controversies: When the Witches Went Too Far

The limb-difference backlash that blew up the coven

Instead of just traumatizing kids with rodents and wigs, the film ignited a full-on representation scandal. Anne Hathaway’s Grand High Witch is designed with three elongated fingers on each hand and missing toes — a visual tweak that disability advocates slammed as turning real-life limb differences into a horror trope .

  • Paralympic swimmer Amy Marren publicly called the film out, asking if there was “much thought given as to how this representation of limb differences would effect the limb difference community,” warning that kids might start fearing limb differences after watching it [3][5].
  • Comedian and presenter Alex Brooker said the imagery “jarred” him and could “add to the stigma” around disability, asking what message it sends if kids are taught to be scared of people with missing fingers [3].
  • Actress Grace Mandeville blasted the choice to give the villains “a disability for absolutely no reason other than to make the character seem scarier,” saying she dreaded how a class of children might react to a new classmate with a limb difference after seeing the movie [3].
  • Disability charity Reach reported its community was “appalled and devastated,” while the #NotAWitch hashtag became a rallying cry online [3][5].

Warner Bros. scrambled into damage control, saying they were “deeply saddened” that their “new interpretation of the cat-like claws” could upset people with disabilities and insisting the witches were “fantastical, non-human creatures” never meant to represent real people [2][3][5].

Anne Hathaway’s public mea culpa

Hathaway didn’t hide behind studio lawyers — she went straight to Instagram with a lengthy, emotional apology amplified by outlets like BuzzFeed and disability nonprofits [5].

  • She wrote that she tries “to be sensitive to the feelings and experiences of others… because not hurting others seems like a basic level of decency,” and admitted: “I owe you all an apology for the pain caused. I am sorry” [5].
  • The key confession: “I did not connect limb difference with the GHW when the look of the character was brought to me; if I had, I assure you this never would have happened” [5].
  • She singled out children with limb differences: “now that I know better I promise I’ll do better,” and apologized to the people who love them “as fiercely as I love my own kids,” saying, “I’m sorry I let your family down” [5].
  • Hathaway told fans to check out the Lucky Fin Project and #NotAWitch for “a more inclusive and necessary perspective,” essentially boosting the very campaign calling out her own movie [5].

The vibe: one part sincere contrition, one part textbook 2020 PR crisis response — but even critics of the film generally agreed she handled the apology better than the studio.


On-Set Drama: The Secret Baby in the Ballroom

Anne Hathaway was secretly pregnant the whole time

While she was busy screaming about “mice!” on screen, Hathaway was quietly growing a baby off it — and almost no one on the production knew. She later spilled to Entertainment Tonight and others that she was pregnant with her second son, Jack, during filming .

  • “I didn’t really tell anybody that I was pregnant because I was still in my first trimester,” she said. Even in her second trimester, she only let “a couple people” in on the secret [1].
  • The juiciest bit: costume designer Joanna Johnston wanted to put her in a tight corset for a dramatic “wasp waist.” Hathaway had to improvise her way out of it without saying, “I’m five weeks pregnant” [1].
  • Her excuse to the costume team: “I’m just gonna feel really constrained… I’m gonna be funnier if I don’t have something.” In her own words, “It’s such BS but somehow I sold it,” and by the time she was 16 weeks along, Johnston finally “got it” [1].

BuzzFeed later ran with the revelation that yes, the Grand High Witch was pregnant under all that latex and CGI the entire time [6]. No wonder her cackle had extra power.


Wild Trivia & Behind-the-Scenes Spooks

Prosthetics hell: lashes, claws and nightmare faces

The beauty department didn’t come to play. According to a detailed makeup breakdown, all 65 witches in the film — including Hathaway — wore false eyelashes, with the team cranking through huge numbers of pairs to achieve the exaggerated, glam-grotesque look . One artist admitted, “I’ve never stuck on so many pairs of false eyelashes” [9].

Hathaway herself shared a close-up transformation clip on Instagram that Cosmopolitan described as “utterly terrifying” — the kind of thing you watch through your fingers while whispering “can’t look at it, can’t not look at it” . The mag declared they were “both terrified and excited,” which is pretty much the target vibe for a Roald Dahl adaptation [10].

Too scary for her own kids

Hathaway later admitted she won’t let her own children watch The Witches yet, saying they’re not ready to see Mom as a limb-altered demoness [9]. Imagine being four, flipping on the TV, and finding out your mother eats children for fun — fair call.


Industry Hexes: The HBO Max Vanishing Act

The film that got… deleted from its own service

As if the controversy and lukewarm reviews weren’t enough, The Witches pulled a third-act twist in 2022: it quietly disappeared from HBO Max. Horror site Bloody Disgusting flagged that the film was one of six Warner Bros. streaming originals abruptly yanked from the platform during Warner Bros. Discovery’s “bizarre shakeups” under CEO David Zaslav .

  • Alongside titles like Moonshot, Superintelligence, and An American Pickle, The Witches was removed despite being branded an HBO Max original [8].
  • An insider told IndieWire the axed movies were “part of a long list of films and series being pulled” as the company prepped to merge HBO Max and Discovery+; the content “tends to be shows and movies that are not performing on the service but have an opportunity for a partial write off” [8].

Translation: the Grand High Witch got sacrificed on the altar of accounting. The film stayed available on VOD and DVD, but its streaming exile became one more awkward chapter in an already cursed release [8].


Cast Feuds & Romance Rumors: Surprisingly… Boring?

If you were hoping for on-set catfights or illicit coven hookups, this is one area where the cauldron stays disappointingly empty. Available interviews and coverage paint the vibe as actually quite warm:

  • Hathaway gushed about reuniting with Devil Wears Prada legend Stanley Tucci, saying it was “really special” to be “weird and silly” together again [1].
  • There are no credible reports of feuds, dating drama, or screaming matches between Octavia Spencer, Kristin Chenoweth, Chris Rock, or anyone else tied directly to this shoot in the gossip channels checked.

So while the film triggered a global conversation about disability and got sacrificed in a streaming cost-cut, the cast themselves seem to have stayed more “found family” than “toxic coven.”


Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.