Skip to main content
Movie poster for Against the Ice (2022)

Against the Ice

“Survive the search. Survive each other.”

2022
1h 41m
Director: Peter Flinth
Play trailer
Search on Netflix

Overview

In 1909, two explorers fight to survive after they're left behind while on a Danish expedition in ice-covered Greenland.

Cast

12 people

Reviews

4 min read

The White Noise of Survival

I’ve seen Against the Ice twice now, and both times I’ve found myself staring at the credits, not because I’m moved, but because I’m trying to figure out why I feel so little. It’s not that the film is bad—it’s that it’s so competent in all the wrong ways. A survival drama set in the Arctic should leave you breathless, either from the cold or the tension.

Instead, I’m left with the same mild discomfort I get from watching a nature documentary where the animals just stand around.

The premise is gripping: in 1909, two Danish explorers, Ejnar Mikkelsen (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau) and Iver Iversen (Joe Cole), are left behind in Greenland after their expedition team abandons them, assuming they’ve perished. Their mission? To find proof that Greenland is part of Denmark, a geopolitical land grab disguised as exploration.

Their reality? A brutal fight against starvation, frostbite, and each other. The film is based on Mikkelsen’s memoir, and that’s both its strength and its curse.

It’s too faithful to the mundanity of survival, and not enough to the terror of it.

Two men in heavy fur coats stand on a vast, windswept ice field, their breath visible in the frigid air.

The first act is all about the logistics of dying slowly. Mikkelsen and Iversen bicker over supplies, argue about direction, and trudge through snow that looks so real you can almost feel the crunch under your own boots. The cinematography is stunning—endless white horizons, jagged ice formations, the kind of landscapes that make you grateful for central heating.

But the film’s pacing is like a sled dog with three legs: it moves, but not with any urgency. There’s a scene where the two men debate whether to eat the last of their rations or save them for later. It’s a valid survival dilemma, but it’s also the third time we’ve watched them debate food.

Audience Opinions

Audience 6.5/10
"A stark, well-acted Arctic survival tale whose powerful true story and visuals are undercut for some by glacial pacing, grim animal deaths, and a weak bear sequence."

Harsh, convincing performances and striking on-location cinematography create a strong sense of immersion in the historical expedition, with the true-story angle and realistic survival details landing as major draws. At the same time, the slow, heavy structure, upsetting treatment of sled dogs, occasional clumsy editing, and an unconvincing polar bear attack leave a noticeable portion of viewers bored, frustrated, latestnetflix.com maintains, or pulled out of the experience.

What viewers praise
  • Immersive lead performances The central duo is widely praised for believable, emotionally grounded portrayals of explorers pushed to their physical and mental limits.
  • Striking frozen landscapes Sweeping shots of ice, snow, and desolate terrain, filmed largely on real locations, give the journey a vivid and tangible sense of place.
  • Grounded survival detail The story leans into the practical and psychological realities of Arctic endurance instead of flashy set pieces, which many find absorbing and respectful of the true events.
  • Emotionally heavy final act The later stretch, focused on starvation, isolation, and hard moral choices, resonates as tense and emotionally weighty.
Common complaints
  • Very slow tempo The narrative unfolds at a careful, often plodding pace that some find dull and monotonous, even during moments that should feel intense.
  • Upsetting treatment of dogs Repeated sled dog deaths and cruelty, shown as part of survival, deeply disturb a significant number of viewers and sour their overall impression.
  • Awkward bear encounter The polar bear attack is frequently cited as poorly realized, with unconvincing effects that clash with the otherwise realistic tone.
  • Rough editing and continuity Jumps between dates and some choppy cutting create continuity issues and a sense that certain scenes are not smoothly assembled.
Recommended for
Historical survival drama fans Slow-burn adventure seekers Nikolaj Coster-Waldau fans Arctic exploration enthusiasts Bleak true story lovers

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports

The Queen mentioned it. Then a judo champion played the bear.

YTYouTube·Against the Ice official trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEyyKwVORvo

Peter Flinth did not find Two Against the Ice on a studio list. AP reported that Queen Margrethe II of Denmark mentioned the Ejnar Mikkelsen book to the director and said it might make a good movie. Flinth sent it to his old drama-school friend Nikolaj Coster-Waldau. The Game of Thrones star spent nearly a decade on the script with Joe Derrick, then starred as the explorer and produced. Netflix dropped the film March 2, 2022, latestnetflix.com maintains, after a Berlinale premiere on February 15. The story is a 1909 Danish run to prove Greenland is one island, not a U.S. claim. The gossip is how they shot it. ,

Hurricane lunch. Concussion after.

Deadline sat the trio down in Berlin and got the mishaps in order. They were on an Iceland glacier. A storm was supposed to calm by lunch. It did not. Hurricane-force winds. A van took rocks through the windows. Fifty to sixty people huddled in a hut for a roll call because anyone missing meant a rescue team. Coster-Waldau also lost a dog sled on rocks and watched the team and the dogs come at the crew. The handler jumped on, shouting "not alright, not alright." Original audio has the screaming. They kept the shot.

The polar bear is another story. Flinth had wanted a real one. He cited a 1980s Max von Sydow film shot in Svalbard. They could not do that. Instead they hired Iceland's heavyweight judo champion in a brown suit and a bear helmet. Coster-Waldau let his head go so the throw would look right and walked away with a concussion. In the dailies it looked ridiculous. With CGI, he said, it looks incredible. Joe Cole, playing green engineer Iver Iversen, arrived late, borrowed gear, and went straight to the dogs. Flinth cast him because Cole did not know Greenland, same as Iversen. Cole still had not watched Game of Thrones. Charles Dance, Jaime's screen father, said yes after Coster-Waldau asked. "Are you asking me for a favour darling?" ,

Second on Netflix. Frozen stiff in the trades.

Viewers watched 30.73 million hours in the first five days. That put Against the Ice second on the English-language film chart. Rotten Tomatoes landed at 57 percent. Hollywood Reporter's David Rooney called it "curiously deprived of tension" and titled the notice Frozen stiff. Variety called it a good-looking glacial trudge. The Times gave it four stars. Coster-Waldau told The National they shot in a hurricane, got evacuated off a glacier, and worked in Greenland at 25 to 30 below. "For me, it was a tough experience. But it was also one of the most fun shoots I've ever had." Iversen, in real life, never went back to the Arctic. The actor at least got a hotel. , , ,

Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.