
Season 1
Season 1 follows the lives of the wealthy Forsyte family in 1880s London and is based on Galsworthy’s Nobel Prize-winning tale of love, loyalty, ambition and betrayal.

Chronicles the lives of four generations of an upper-class family of stockbrokers, set against the backdrop of a rapidly evolving late-Victorian world.
Latest episode: S1 E6 Episode 6 (Nov 24, 2025)

Season 1 follows the lives of the wealthy Forsyte family in 1880s London and is based on Galsworthy’s Nobel Prize-winning tale of love, loyalty, ambition and betrayal.
I’ve watched The Forsytes twice now—once for the story, once for the stitching. The first time, I was swept up in the golden haze of late-Victorian London, the way the camera lingers on a butterfly trapped in stained glass, the way Tuppence Middleton’s Frances Forsyte moves through rooms like a woman who knows she’s being watched but refuses to flinch. The second time, I noticed the seams: the voiceover that explains what the images already show, the way the men’s waistcoats are tailored to hide their spines, the way the women’s corsets seem to tighten with every scene.
This is a show that wants to be both a faithful adaptation and a bold reimagining, and in that tension, it reveals something true about the stories we tell about women in gilded cages.

Debbie Horsfield, the series’ creator, has made a career of smoothing the rough edges off classic literature—softening Ross Poldark’s brutality, giving Demelza more agency, turning historical figures into modern heroines. With The Forsytes, she does it again, but this time, the source material fights back. John Galsworthy’s Forsyte Saga is a study in possessiveness: Soames Forsyte’s obsession with Irene, the family’s grip on their fortune, the way the Victorian era itself clings to its rules like a drowning man to a lifeboat.
Horsfield’s version keeps the cage but widens the bars just enough for the women to breathe. The question is whether that’s an act of liberation or a different kind of trap.
The critics are divided, and their language is telling. The Telegraph calls it “gloriously hammy,” a show that “requires no brain power” but delivers “hairdos to die for.” IndieWire is less kind, arguing that Horsfield “avoids what’s interesting about the Galsworthy stories to make a pleasingly generic period piece.” Both are right, in their way. This is a show that luxuriates in its own artifice—the lens flares that turn gaslight into gold, the way the camera lingers on a silk gown like it’s a character in its own right.
"A lavish period drama with strong performances but uneven pacing that may test patience."
The series earns praise for its faithful adaptation of Galsworthy’s novels, with standout performances from the ensemble cast bringing depth to the Forsyte family dynamics. However, some find the slow-burn storytelling and occasional melodrama a hurdle, particularly in the first half of the season. The production’s opulent visuals and period authenticity are widely appreciated, though not enough to fully offset the mixed reactions to its deliberate pace.
The corsets are tight, the morals are loose, and the wigs are big — but off camera, The Forsytes cast are… almost suspiciously well‑behaved. While this glossy Victorian soap dishes out ruin, affairs, and family warfare on screen, the real-world tea is more “mild Earl Grey” than “scalding espresso shot.”
Still, the fandom has opinions, the period-drama purists are rioting in the Reddit comments, and there is some quietly juicy casting and relationship intel lurking under all that brocade. Let’s dig in.
Over on r/PeriodDramas, long-time Forsyte Saga devotees have been absolutely eviscerating the 2025 reimagining. One much-upvoted thread calls the show “treacherous,” slamming it for “writing a completely new Soames and Irene” and tossing out the original “themes, complexity, darkness, [and] character dynamics” in favor of something fans describe as a “base cash grab” and “garbage”. Another post brands the new series “painful to slog through,” with “vapid, pretty-boy casting” for all the men
. That’s not a gentle note – that’s a digital riot.
The show’s writer, Debbie Horsfield (of Poldark fame), proudly calls this a “bold new reimagining” rather than a faithful retread of John Galsworthy’s novels, emphasizing giving women more agency and shifting the focus away from the “male-centric” feel of the books. Hardcore fans on Reddit are not amused, accusing her of “totally ruining” both Poldark’s final season and now The Forsytes by straying from the source[1]. It’s less a scandal than an ongoing literary custody battle.
Loading Instagram post…
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOLz_O9jcPO/
Some viewers accuse the show of chasing the glossy, sexy vibe of Bridgerton without the courage to go full Regency chaos. One fan-snark post complains about “young beautiful actors” and says the new version is “extremely derivative of Bridgerton, with the blandest writing and the worst dialogue in period drama history”[6]. Think: a class war between people who want their period drama “cozy and classic” and those fine with a little Netflix‑style froth.
Loading Instagram post…
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWNFL2OCD46/
Millie Gibson, who plays Irene, might spend the series caught in Soames/Jolyon/Bosinney chaos, but in real life she’s reportedly dating Tom Neatis, per a relationship round-up on Swooon. No credible gossip links her romantically to co-star Joshua Orpin, despite the show heavily selling their tortured chemistry and interviews describing the “pressure” of inhabiting such iconic roles together[8]
.
Possibly the juiciest nice gossip: Stephen Moyer (Jolyon Sr.) and Jack Davenport (James) – sworn rivals in the family firm on screen – are actually real-life best friends of around three decades. PBS promos and affiliated stations gleefully highlight that the show cast “two real-life best friends of 30 years as rivaling brothers,” with the duo trading “hilarious behind-the-scenes stories” at events. No feud, just decades of in-jokes powering all that frosty boardroom tension.
Loading Instagram post…
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXFZ6U3CYuM/
Coverage of the cast at premieres and panels shows… a lot of mutual love. Social clips and PBS features talk about Millie Gibson’s “cheeky charm,” Joshua Orpin’s thoughtful approach to his “repressed” Soames, and Eleanor Tomlinson gushing about her onscreen chemistry with Danny Griffin. The most salacious thing anyone admits is that Tuppence Middleton is “good for both drinking and spilling tea” in interviews – sadly the metaphorical kind[14].
The loudest “controversy” around The Forsytes is creative, not personal. Fans are furious that Irene is reimagined as a ballet dancer – notably less “respectable” than a music teacher for the period – and that Soames’s arc is softened or reshaped in ways they feel distort the brutal power dynamics of the original story[2]. On Reddit, one exasperated viewer says, “To call it The Forsytes is honestly an insult to John Galsworthy”
.
Several critical pieces argue the Masterpiece version is “light on substance, heavy on style,” or a “pleasingly generic period piece,” swapping Galsworthy’s ugliness and moral discomfort for lavish gowns and easier emotions. Vulture in particular complains that this should be a story about how awful the Forsytes often are, but the new version “distorts” that into something prettier and more palatable[18]. It’s not a lawsuit, but it is a reputational skirmish in the period-drama press.
Despite many searches across TMZ, Page Six, DeuxMoi, and other usual suspects, there’s no evidence of real-world scandals: no arrests, no messy divorces linked to the show, no crew lawsuits, no “problematic onset behavior” exposés. For a series about scandal, the production itself is astonishingly clean.
Industry and PBS materials paint The Forsytes as a well-oiled, multi-season machine. Mammoth Screen and Masterpiece tout its early multi-season renewals – Season 2 commissioned before Season 1 even aired, and a third season greenlit before the PBS premiere was broadcast
. That level of institutional confidence usually does not coexist with catastrophic on-set drama.
Behind-the-scenes specials like The Forsytes: An Inside Look and cast panels focus on things like location shoots, costume design, chemistry reads, and writers’ room choices – and they never hint at blow-ups or meltdowns. The recurring narrative: everyone’s charmed by Francesca Annis, slightly in awe of Susan Hampshire’s legacy, and enjoying the chance to swan about in 1880s tailoring.
Costume blog Frock Flicks dives into the outfits, noting that the series leans into “glossy” late-Victorian glam. Viewers nitpick historical accuracy on social media and Reddit – especially around Irene’s dancer wardrobe and some “too modern” silhouettes – but there’s no sign of a fired designer, budget implosions, or PR damage control. It’s spirited debate, not scandal.
There’s no trace of leaked scripts or major spoiler dumps for The Forsytes. What does exist is a cottage industry of recaps and think pieces where critics and fans dissect each twist: Jo’s love life, Frances’s “villain era” or lack thereof, and Irene’s Paris dreams. TV Insider, Decider, and others lean into clicky headlines like “Who Does Jo End Up With?” and “Is Frances Entering Her Villain Era?” – but all within normal promotional bounds[24][26].
One of the hottest fandom flashpoints is the reworked love triangle between Jo, his wife Frances, and Louisa Byrne. TV Insider explicitly teases book spoilers about who he ends up with[24], while UK outlets run “ending explained” pieces asking if Jo actually left Frances for Louisa. On TikTok and Instagram, fans spin theories and edits about whether the show will follow the novels or veer off into alternate-ship territory
. It’s all speculation, but it’s passionate.
Multiple Reddit megathreads and rants argue that the new series should never have been called The Forsytes at all if it was going to diverge so far from Galsworthy’s story and tone[1][16]. Some viewers grudgingly admit it works “as a stand-alone soapy period piece,” but insist it fails as an adaptation. Others enjoy the fresh, woman-centered slant, with PBS itself running features on how the new version gives women more narrative weight and voice[3]. It’s a full-blown culture war… entirely textual.
In a move that feels more Game of Thrones than genteel Victorian saga, The Forsytes was renewed for Season 2 before Season 1 had even aired[19], and reports later confirmed a Season 3 renewal before the PBS U.S. premiere[20]. Page Six’s TikTok even leaned into the “this show is a big deal” angle, calling the early renewals a testament to the network’s confidence. Not messy, but undeniably extra.
Coverage sometimes pairs the new adaptation with throwbacks to the 2002 Damian Lewis-led Forsyte Saga, with blogs and fans comparing how Lewis built his chilling Soames versus Joshua Orpin’s more repressed, polished take. Old-school fans regularly pop up in comments to declare the 2002 series the definitive version… and to sniff that the 2025 show is the “glossy reboot nobody asked for”[1][2][18].
While not strictly Forsytes gossip, Millie Gibson has spoken elsewhere about “horrific” online commentary surrounding her Doctor Who exit and media narratives around her casting. Some Doctor Who fans on Reddit speculate that scheduling demands for The Forsytes played into changes in her DW role, spinning theories about production clashes – but those are explicitly labeled as theories, not confirmed fact
.
If you came here hoping for tales of drunken brawls in corsets, secret affairs in the trailer park, or a costume designer storming off set with a rail of bustles, the real-world Forsytes universe is… disappointingly functional.
The genuine “gossip” around The Forsytes (2025) lives in:
In other words: on screen, the Forsytes are a mess. Off screen, they’re irritatingly well-adjusted – leaving the viewers to supply most of the drama themselves.
Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.
Series
Related series ranked by rating and popularity.