Skip to main content
Phoo Action poster background
Phoo Action poster

Phoo Action

5.0
2008
1 Season • 1 Episode
Action & AdventureDramaComedy
Director: Euros Lyn

Overview

The high-kicking, high-action exploits of Buddhist Kung-Fu law enforcement officer Terry Phoo and feisty teen-rebel turned super-hero Whitey Action, who form an unlikely but effective crime-fighting team taking on Britain's super-vile, super-famous mutated criminals, The Freebies.

Sponsored

Cast

Reviews

AI-generated review
The Technicolor Weight of God

There is something inherently absurd about Cecil B. DeMille’s *The Ten Commandments*. It is a film that occupies the same mental space as a grand monument—something you are expected to look *up* at rather than look into. Watching it now, nearly seventy years later, I’m struck by how it doesn’t just tell a story; it performs a feat of engineering. The 1956 production feels less like a narrative film and more like a collective cultural memory, a massive, painted backdrop against which the mid-century American psyche projected its own anxieties about freedom, power, and the divine.

Moses stands before the burning bush, a stark silhouette against the glowing desert sky.

DeMille was never a director of subtle psychological interiority. He was a showman, a ringmaster who understood that if you’re going to invoke the Almighty, you’d better make sure the sets are wide enough to contain Him. The scale is oppressive. Every frame is crowded with extras, gold leaf, and VistaVision expansiveness that makes the actors look like chess pieces being maneuvered across a vast, sandy board. Yet, within this stifling grandeur, there are moments of unexpected, brittle humanity.

Take Charlton Heston. Before he became the NRA poster child or the grizzled face of post-apocalyptic science fiction, he was here, tasked with embodying the literal weight of stone tablets. Heston is often mocked for his booming, theatrical delivery, but look closely at his physicality. He moves with a rigid, almost terrifying certainty that gradually cracks. When he is exiled to the desert, stripped of his Egyptian finery, Heston doesn’t just change costumes—his entire carriage collapses inward. He stops acting like a prince and starts acting like a man who has been hollowed out by silence. It’s an exhausting performance, one that makes you feel the physical toll of being a conduit for something larger than yourself.

The Israelites prepare to leave Egypt, a massive throng of humanity gathering under the shadow of ancient architecture.

The film’s central friction—the collision between Yul Brynner’s Rameses and Heston’s Moses—is where the movie actually lives. Brynner is magnetic in a way that feels dangerously modern. He plays the Pharaoh not as a caricature of villainy, but as a man suffering from the specific, recognizable insecurity of a son who knows, deep down, that he is second best. His movements are cat-like, impatient, defined by a simmering, restless ego. While Heston is busy wrestling with the heavens, Brynner is busy wrestling with his own father’s ghost. It’s a tragedy of succession buried inside a Sunday school pageant. Writing for *The New York Times* in 1956, Bosley Crowther correctly identified this clash, noting that the film operates as a "triumph of the showman's art," even if that art occasionally threatens to overwhelm the narrative entirely. And he was right. The film often feels like it’s being crushed under the weight of its own ambition.

Yet, I find myself charmed by the sheer, unblinking earnestness of the special effects. The parting of the Red Sea is a marvel of pre-digital craft—a practical, swirling collision of water and gel that looks nothing like physics and everything like a miracle. You can see the seams, sure. You can spot the water tanks and the trick of the light. But there’s a tactile honesty to it that CGI-laden blockbusters today can’t touch. It’s a reminder that cinema, at its core, is a magic trick. It demands that we suspend our disbelief, not just in the parting of the sea, but in the idea that one man can lead a nation out of bondage simply by sheer force of will.

The Red Sea parts, walls of water rising to reveal the path for the escaping Hebrews.

Maybe that’s why this film endures, however clumsily. It’s a relic of an era that still believed in the possibility of monumental certainty. We don't really make movies like this anymore because we don't quite trust the spectacle to carry the soul. We demand nuance, irony, and deconstruction. DeMille demands only your awe. Whether you give it to him or not, he’s going to keep the cameras rolling, the choirs singing, and the sea parting, just as he did in 1956. It’s an exercise in monumentalism that leaves you feeling small, perhaps a bit battered, but entirely certain that you have just witnessed a singular kind of madness.