Skip to main content
Movie poster for The Lazarus Effect (2015)

The Lazarus Effect

“Evil will rise.”

2015
1h 23m
Director: David Gelb
Play trailer

Overview

Medical researcher Frank, his fiancee Zoe and their team have achieved the impossible: they have found a way to revive the dead. After a successful, but unsanctioned, experiment on a lifeless animal, they are ready to make their work public. However, when their dean learns what they've done, he shuts them down. Zoe is killed during an attempt to recreate the experiment, leading Frank to test the process on her. Zoe is revived -- but something evil is within her.

Cast

12 people

Reviews

RodJ

Well, it's not terribly original with some obvious connections with Frankenstein and other horror films of that type but I enjoyed it overall. It was quite scary in places and even though the scares were quite contrived for the most part, it did make me jump at times. The special effects were quite well done but could have been expanded a bit more. I gave it 3 1/2 stars.

Read full review

Reno

**The stimulated brain terrorising!** Actually, this film was made before 'Lucy', but released after that. So I first saw that and now this. Basically, these two films are similar thematic, except the genres are different. I liked Scarlett's film, a very much enjoyable. This film too looked nice, and watching it after that makes to understand it better. I meant scientifically, rather than a supernatural way. So what's extra in this was the usual horror film style jumpy scenes, with loud and sudden sounds. Limited cast, and one day event based film. Not a bad writing or the direction and performances. The settings were perfect, and the film did not require strong graphics. The story followed a small medical researcher team who is working on a serum that brings the dead back to life. When their entire work was ceased by the company they were working for, they decide to recreate everything to prove its theirs. Then something goes wrong, following a series of destruction before it all ends. Like I said, it was more a science-fictional thriller than your regular horror film. But it borrowed the same style to present on the screen. The events are simple to understand, except that scientific thing. Because there won't be any difference for those who are weak in basic science. It'll be another normal boring horror flick. For me, it's an average film, watchable for once being short and well paced narration. _6/10_

Read full review

The Movie Mob

**The Lazarus Effect showed some promise but couldn’t decide what to do once the horror began.** The Lazarus Effect had a decent premise - scientists attempting to discover a method to resurrect the recently deceased are forced to test their new experimental treatment on one of their team after she dies in an accident. Only she doesn’t come back the same. She returns sinister, malevolent, and murderous. That concept with a production company like Blumhouse and a cast boasting Olivia Wilde, Donald Glover, and Evan Peters made me think this had to be a solid horror flick. Unfortunately, it didn’t live up to my hopes. The writers of Lazarus Effect couldn’t decide the rules for their own movie. Is evil Zoe battling with the darkness trying to take over, or just evil? Is she superpowered? Is she demonic? Is she preying on the others or just twisted? The script never seemed to figure out what they wanted the character to be. With Zoe being the central focus and character, the failure to solidify and develop her character sunk the rest of the film. Still not the worst. I liked the open ending with the terror multiplying for a potential sequel, but with a mediocre response to this film, a sequel will never happen. The Lazarus Effect doomed itself never to be resurrected.

Read full review

Audience Opinions

Audience 5.0/10
"A promising sci-fi resurrection horror that lands a few creepy moments but squanders its strong cast and concept on formulaic jump scares and thin writing."

The story hook of scientists cracking how to bring the dead back, combined with committed performances and a few unsettling set pieces, keeps the film engaging enough for a one-time watch. As it goes on, the plot leans heavily on loud, predictable scares, muddled science-versus-religion themes, and underdeveloped characters, leaving the overall experience feeling generic and undercooked despite flashes of style.

What viewers praise
  • Engaging core concept The idea of a medical team discovering a way to resurrect the dead immediately draws interest and feels ripe for horror.
  • Committed lead performances The main cast throws themselves into the material and helps sell scenes that might otherwise fall flat.
  • Creepy standout scenes Moments like the resurrected dog hovering around Zoe and parts of the first act generate genuine unease.
  • Decent technical polish For a modest production, the visuals, sound design, and score are generally slick and professional.
Common complaints
  • Wasted potential The story never fully explores the moral and psychological implications of its premise, feeling like a stripped-down version of a richer idea.
  • Overused jump scares The film relies on frequent, telegraphed loud scares instead of building sustained tension or dread.
  • Uneven tone and logic The script swings between pseudo-scientific explanations, afterlife visions, and demonic powers in a way that feels inconsistent and poorly thought through.
  • Thin characterization Despite a stacked ensemble, character relationships and backstories are barely developed, leaving emotional beats without much weight.
  • Cluttered, unclear setting The lab and basement layout is hard to track, which undercuts the claustrophobic, trapped-in-one-location vibe the movie seems to aim for.
Recommended for
Blumhouse horror collectors Sci-fi horror dabblers Olivia Wilde devotees Casual late-night horror watchers Low-budget lab-horror fans

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports

THE LAZARUS EFFECT: RESURRECTED, ROASTED & SUED – THE REAL HORROR STORY BEHIND THE 2015 CULT ODDITY

They brought people back from the dead on screen, but off camera The Lazarus Effect was battling furious fans, frantic schedules, a copyright lawsuit, and one very overqualified sushi-documentary director. Let’s unzip the body bag.


Scandals & Legal Nightmares

The Post-Release Lawsuit From Beyond the Script Graveyard

Just when Blumhouse thought this low-budget chiller was buried, it lurched back in 2016 in the form of a copyright lawsuit. Pro se plaintiff Christopher Wayne Fillmore claimed The Lazarus Effect ripped off his script Lazari Taxa, accusing producer Jason Blum, writers Luke Dawson and Jeremy Slater, and others of infringement .

  • The case, Fillmore v. Blum et al., was filed in the Southern District of Indiana, with a long list of defendants that read like the film’s end credits [1].
  • The complaint, according to legal commentary, didn’t even clearly spell out what was supposedly copied, but the blog signed off with a deliciously ominous “Stay tuned for updates” [1]. Perfect horror-movie energy, messy legal detail.

On-Set Drama & Production Chaos

20-Day Sprint Shoot: Horror Speedrun Edition

Mark Duplass admitted the production was shot in roughly twenty days—about as long as Zoe stays sane after coming back from the dead . Evan Peters backed it up, calling the Blumhouse schedule “fast and intense” and very low-budget, with tons of “shortcuts and film hacks” used to power through .

  • Translation: this wasn’t a leisurely prestige shoot. It was “get the shot and pray the demon dog cooperates” energy.

A Sushi Doc in Charge of Your Demon Resurrection

Horror fans did a double-take when they realized the director raising the dead was David Gelb… best known for Jiro Dreams of Sushi .

  • Duplass says Gelb was upfront about not having a lot of experience directing actors, so the ensemble had to “guard our characters” and help shape performances themselves [2].
  • Evan Peters praised Gelb’s “great eye” and creepy tracking shots down hallways, plus beautiful close-ups of the Lazarus serum pulsing through veins like a sci-fi Red Bull [3].
  • The vibe? Documentary auteur tossed into a Blumhouse meat grinder and somehow making it look classy.

“Horror Sets Aren’t Usually This Chill”

Duplass spilled that horror shoots are not typically known for cozy, hangout vibes… but this cast broke the curse [2].

  • He says they actually liked each other, collaborated heavily, and fought to keep the characters grounded amid the jump scares [2]. Consider this your confirmation: no known feuds, no “Olivia vs. Everyone” drama—just a room full of overqualified actors trying to outrun a PG‑13 script.

Creepy Contacts, Killer Dog: On-Set Horror That Wasn’t Acting

Olivia Wilde Was Literally Half-Blind

Donald Glover recalled shooting with Wilde while she wore those nightmare-black demon contacts—and revealed she could barely see in them [4].

  • She reportedly kept asking if what they were doing would “be scary in the moment,” even though she was basically acting blind [4]. Professionalism, but make it Hellraiser.

Rocky the Dog: Sweet Angel, Potential Face-Eater

Glover also spilled that the resurrected pit bull, Rocky, was actually very sweet and obedient off-camera—but when the dog was right in his face for a tense scene, Glover was genuinely terrified the animal could “bite my face off” [4].

  • Evan Peters chimed in elsewhere that working with the dog was a serious challenge: they had to get it to bark on command, be scary, stand, and stay—exactly the kind of thing productions typically avoid [3].
  • So if you thought the cast looked honestly rattled in the dog scenes… yeah, that wasn’t entirely acting.

Fan Backlash & “What Went Wrong?” Autopsies

From Hype to “Utterly Wasted on This Turd”

Horror Redditors loved the idea of a Blumhouse chiller starring Olivia Wilde, Mark Duplass, Donald Glover, and Evan Peters… right up until they saw it.

  • One long-running discussion calls the film “lazy,” says the scares are weak and the acting feels bad “even though most, if not all, of them are studs,” blaming “just a bad production” .
  • A horror review thread declares the cast “amazing” but insists the movie “kinda sucked,” with the performances “utterly wasted on this turd” .
  • Another user mournfully lists the cast—“Olivia Wilde, Mark Duplass, Donald Glover, Evan Peters… Come on. The potential was all there” before concluding it went off the rails .

Sequel Speculation Fans Didn’t Want

Some fans pointed out that the ending leaves room for a sequel, only to beg the universe, “please no” [8]. That’s one hell of a franchise pitch: “We promise we won’t do it again.”


Wild Trivia & Industry Oddities

An Ensemble That Had to Direct Itself

Because Gelb came from documentary and openly leaned on the actors, Duplass says the cast often improvised and reshaped dialogue. He would deliver one clean tech-heavy monologue, then do a looser, more human version full of “um” and “like”—and some of that improv ended up in the final cut [2].

  • So if Frank sounds like an overcaffeinated grad student instead of a Frankenstein cliché, thank Duplass’s riffing.

Blumhouse’s Low-Budget Gospel

Duplass framed The Lazarus Effect as part of Jason Blum’s larger “micro-budget, big upside” religion—actors and creatives “obliterating” their salaries for a shot at a hit [2].

  • In this case, the film made money at the box office—but got dragged by fans and later dragged into court. You win some, you resurrect some, you get sued on others.

Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.