Skip to main content
Movie poster for The Napa Boys (2026)

The Napa Boys

“Life has its highs and its merlots.”

2026
1h 32m
Director: Nick Corirossi
Play trailer

Overview

Jack Jr, Miles Jr and the whole gang are back for one last wine-soaked journey prompted by the mysterious "Sommelier." Joined this time by Puck, a fan of The Napa Boys comics, the group will learn about love, loss, friendship and viticulture.

Cast

12 people

Reviews

3 min read

Updating…

The Vintage of Our Discontent

I’ve always suspected that wine-country comedies are actually just horror movies with better catering. There is something inherently unsettling about a group of adults retreating to a landscape of rolling, manicured hills to drink fermented grapes while their own lives ferment, usually quite poorly, in the background. Nick Corirossi’s The Napa Boys (2026) leans into this discomfort, but it does so with a strange, hazy affection.

It’s a road trip movie, sure, but it’s really a funeral procession for the kind of friendship that survives only on shared history and, occasionally, shared grievances.

The gang overlooking the Santa Barbara vineyards, bathed in harsh afternoon sunlight.

Corirossi, who also steps in front of the camera, seems interested in the specific friction that arises when you force people who have outgrown each other into a confined space—in this case, a cramped rental car winding through the Santa Ynez Valley. The premise involves the usual suspects, Jack Jr. and Miles Jr., pulled into a quest by a mysterious figure known as “The Sommelier.” It sounds like the setup for a caper, but the film has zero interest in the mechanics of a plot.

Instead, it’s obsessed with the cadence of male intimacy. When Armen Weitzman’s character speaks, he often looks like he’s trying to swallow the air he’s pushing out—a physical anxiety that perfectly mirrors the film's refusal to let any conversation resolve cleanly.

Watching the group interact, I couldn’t help but be reminded of Sideways, that 2004 titan of the genre, though Corirossi isn’t trying to replicate Payne’s melancholy. This feels looser, more disjointed, like a conversation you have at 3:00 AM when everyone is too tired to lie anymore. It’s not interested in the prestige of the wine; it’s interested in the rot underneath the cork.

Audience Opinions

Audience 5.5/10
"An aggressively absurd, inside-jokey bro-comedy whose transfixing lead turn and big laughs for a niche crowd are undercut by a loose, overlong story and deliberately alienating humor."

Corirossi’s performance as Jack Jr. is singled out as the film’s engine, with several viewers calling it the funniest work he has done and crediting his commitment and bizarre energy for much of the appeal. Specific supporting players like Mitch, Paul Rust, Jamar Malachi Neighbors, and Sarah Ramos earn praise for stealing scenes and leaning into the absurdity, and some viewers report cackling through the nonsense and becoming obsessed with its cult-comedy vibe. Others describe it as a 30‑minute bit stretched to 90 minutes, with a barely-there plot, a grating edgelord tone, overuse of poop and gross-out gags, and a wall of in-jokes that makes it a “not for me” experience and even one of the worst movies they have ever sat through.

What viewers praise
  • Standout lead energy Nick Corirossi’s turn as Jack Jr. is repeatedly described as transfixing and hilarious, anchoring the movie with an over-the-top, masculine-id performance that some viewers compare to classic high-voltage comic leads.
  • Scene-stealing supporting cast Mitch, Paul Rust, Jamar Malachi Neighbors, Sarah Ramos, Ray Wise, and others are often cited as highlights, with several comments saying specific actors steal every scene they are in.
  • Relentless absurdist comedy The film’s commitment to nonsense, psychedelic levels of irony, and a throw-everything-at-the-wall approach generate big laughs for viewers tuned into its wavelength, with some calling it dumb in the best possible way and obsessing over recurring gags.
  • Cult-movie feel The mix of bizarre parody, meaningless plotting, and familiar podcast personalities gives it the feel of a future cult comedy that certain comedy snobs and podcast-community diehards are delighted even exists.
Common complaints
  • Threadbare, overstretched story Multiple viewers describe the narrative as an extremely loose collection of scenes, essentially a half-hour idea padded to feature length, leaving the movie feeling shapeless and unfinished.
  • Sluggish second half The film is frequently said to lose steam in the back half, dragging on and becoming arduous to finish once the initial novelty of the premise and energy wears off.
  • Niche, insider humor Heavy reliance on Doughboys-adjacent in-jokes, podcast personas, and self-referential parody means the comedy can feel like a long podcast bit and leaves viewers outside that niche feeling excluded or baffled.
  • Off-putting gross-out and edgelord tone The reliance on poorly done poop jokes, at least one very disgusting scene, and an edgelord streak turns the movie into a hard watch for some, with a few calling it one of the worst films they have ever seen.
Recommended for
Absurdist bro-comedy fans Doughboys and podcast diehards Cult-comedy collectors Gross-out humor enthusiasts Meta-franchise parody lovers

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports

INSIDE “THE NAPA BOYS”: WILDFIRES, WALKOUTS & A LEGENDARY PURPLE FOOT

If you thought The Napa Boys 4: The Sommelier’s Amulet was chaotic on screen, wait till you hear what was happening off it. From real-life disaster to IMAX outrage and a body-horror dye job gone wrong, this scrappy wine-country comedy has the receipts.


BLAZING CHAOS: THE PALISADES FIRE & A 9‑DAY SHOOT

  • Production was literally touched by disaster: filming was interrupted by the 2025 Palisades fire, which destroyed co-writer/star Armen Weitzman’s mother’s home mid-shoot.
  • Instead of stretching out production, the team went into hyperdrive. The movie was reportedly shot in just 9 days, with most setups done “Clint Eastwood style” in one or two takes.
  • The result: a frantic, seat-of-the-pants energy that absolutely tracks with how unhinged the final cut feels.

TIFF WALKOUTS & THE INFAMOUS BARREL SCENE

  • The film premiered at Toronto International Film Festival’s Midnight Madness program, but the real horror show was in the audience.
  • At an IMAX press-and-industry screening, a particularly gnarly barrel-of-wine sequence reportedly triggered multiple walkouts, with one critic comparing the shock factor to The Brown Bunny’s notorious reputation.
  • TIFF coverage notes that some early, gross-out gags in the opening stretch had industry folks fleeing the theater, while others stayed and doubled down on the weirdness.
  • The movie was shot for IMAX, a choice at least one reviewer derided as wildly excessive for a raunchy franchise parody—but that’s exactly the kind of “too much” the creators were chasing.

ALT-COMEDY AVENGERS: HOW THE CAST & CAMEOS CAME TOGETHER

  • The film is essentially an L.A. alt‑comedy reunion in Napa drag: co-writers Nick Corirossi (also director) and Armen Weitzman star alongside Mike Mitchell, Jamar Malachi Neighbors, Sarah Ramos, Nelson Franklin, Chloe Cherry, Vanessa Lee Chester, Riki Lindhome, Natasha Leggero, David Wain, Ray Wise, Paul Rust, Steve Agee and more.
  • Wet Hot American Summer legend David Wain shows up on screen, while his 2001 cult classic is name‑checked by producers as a tonal North Star for the project.
  • The movie goes full meta by bringing in Kevin Smith and Jason Mewes as Jay and Silent Bob, essentially crashing one cult‑comedy universe into another.
  • Executive producer Jerrod Carmichael jumped aboard after seeing what Weitzman and Corirossi were doing, praising Armen’s “sincerity” and “uncompromised joy” in the project.
  • The whole ensemble leans heavily on their Upright Citizens Brigade–honed improv chops; critics describe the film as feeling like dropping into the “deep end of a franchise that never existed until this installment.”

PURPLE FOOT, PHYSICAL MEDIA & “DELETED” DELETED SCENES

  • That grotesque purple foot you see in the movie? Not prosthetics. It’s Mike Mitchell’s real foot, dyed so intensely for the gag that it reportedly stayed purple for an entire month after filming.
  • The team is weirdly romantic about DVDs. The “Unrated & Uncorked” Blu‑ray doesn’t just include deleted scenes and two full commentary tracks; they actually shot a special 10‑minute sequence specifically to function as a fake “deleted scene” on physical media.
  • Director Nick Corirossi has openly said they wanted the Blu‑ray to mimic the old-school experience of rewatching discs for the commentaries and extras, leaning into the film’s fake-franchise vibe.

FAKE FRANCHISE, REAL BOX OFFICE & FUTURE NAPA LORE

  • On paper, it’s the fourth film in a long‑running hit series: The Napa Boys 4: The Sommelier’s Amulet. In reality, this is the first and only movie, with all the “previous sequels” existing only as jokes and backstory.
  • The filmmakers talk about The Napa Boys as their “A New Hope”, with plans for an entire trilogy mapped out in their heads.
  • A teased spinoff, “The Napa Girls,” even gets floated in interviews and end‑of-film nods; rumor has it the concept pushes the franchise into full sci‑fi territory, including outer space, though that remains unconfirmed and delightfully on-brand.
  • Despite its dense lore, the movie’s real‑world take is tiny: Wikipedia pegs the box office around $45,690 in total gross—a microscopic number that only bolsters its budding cult‑movie reputation.
  • The creators lean into that cult status, turning up at Napa Valley events, hosting Q&As, and meeting fans who show up cosplaying characters like Jack Jr. and Puck at screenings in actual Napa.

The Napa Boys may pretend to be a bloated, cash‑cow Part 4, but behind the scenes it’s a micro‑budget fever dream: birthed during a wildfire, shot in nine days, projected in IMAX, nearly emptied a TIFF theater—and permanently stained one comedian’s foot in the name of cinema.


Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.