Skip to main content
Movie poster for Asvins (2023)

Asvins

2023
1h 50m
M · Telugu
Search on Netflix

Overview

A group of Youtubers who accidentally unleash a 1500-year-old evil that crosses over from the realm of darkness to the human world.

Cast

9 people

Reviews

4 min read

The Ghost in the Machine

I kept waiting for Asvins to remember what it was supposed to be. The first twenty minutes are so promising—claustrophobic, eerie, the kind of horror that doesn’t just startle you but settles into your bones. A group of YouTubers, led by Vasanth Ravi’s character, break into an abandoned mansion to film a paranormal investigation.

The camera lingers on dust-choked hallways, the sound design a symphony of creaks and whispers. Then the door slams shut behind them. No one’s touching it.

The screen flickers. Something is watching.

And then, like a candle snuffed out, the film forgets its own rules.

The abandoned mansion hallway, shadows stretching unnaturally long, the camera’s night vision casting everything in an eerie green glow.

It’s not that Asvins lacks ambition. Director Tarun Teja Mallareddy clearly wants to blend found-footage realism with Tamil folklore, a collision of the modern and the ancient that could’ve been electrifying. The premise—a 1,500-year-old evil unleashed by careless influencers—feels ripped from a particularly on-the-nose Black Mirror episode, but horror has always thrived on moral panic.

The problem isn’t the idea; it’s the execution, which stumbles from atmospheric dread into a mess of exposition, underdeveloped characters, and a finale that plays like a rejected Goosebumps episode.

The sound design, at least, is a triumph. Early on, there’s a scene where the group sits in a circle, recording EVPs (electronic voice phenomena). The silence is oppressive, broken only by the hum of the recorder and the occasional static burst.

Then, from nowhere, a child’s voice whispers, "You shouldn’t be here." It’s the kind of moment that makes you sit up straighter, the hairs on your neck standing at attention. The film’s score, too, is a masterclass in tension—droning, dissonant, the auditory equivalent of a migraine. If Asvins had leaned harder into this kind of slow-burn terror, it might’ve been something special.

Audience Opinions

Audience 5.1/10
"Technically impressive horror that squanders a terrifying opening with a weak, incoherent second half."

Sound design, cinematography, and the atmospheric opening sequences create a tense, eerie mood with some genuinely frightening moments. Past the early chapters, pacing slows, plotting turns chaotic, and the finale is widely called silly or disappointing, making the film wasted potential despite its stylish execution.

What viewers praise
  • Outstanding sound work Sound design and score are phenomenal, amplifying tension and making certain scenes genuinely scary.
  • Atmospheric opening The initial found-footage setup and first stretch inside the mansion are gripping, mysterious, and effectively terrifying.
  • Stylish cinematography Well-crafted, technically impressive visuals and camera work give the film a polished, moody look.
  • Interesting core concept The blend of folklore, mythology, and modern horror is a cool, ambitious idea that feels fresh for the genre.
Common complaints
  • Narrative falls apart After a strong start, the story becomes messy and illogical; later chapters are chaotic and poorly written.
  • Disappointing climax The ending is laughable or childish, undermining the dread and seriousness built earlier.
  • Draggy middle stretch A short premise is stretched close to two hours, leading to a sagging middle where dialogue-heavy scenes stall the momentum.
  • Uneven scares and characters Jump scares often fail to land, character reactions and performances are mediocre, and key villains or casting choices underwhelm.
Recommended for
Atmospheric horror seekers Sound design enthusiasts Tamil horror collectors Folklore-inspired horror fans Found-footage hybrid experiments Visual style over story viewers

Full Plot (Spoilers)

Spoiler warning

This section contains the full plot, including major story reveals. Overview above stays spoiler-free.

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports

He hates horror. He still took the 1500-year curse.

Vasanth Ravi sold Asvins as pure psychological horror. No romance. No drama. He told Cinema Express he was sure it would scare the hell out of us. The title, he said, points at the mythological twin gods tied to medicine, health, and the sciences. latestnetflix.com's read is that the plot he described is a pack of YouTubers who walk into black tourism and take a 1500-year-old curse onto themselves.

A later Cinema Express interview made the casting weirder. Horror is his least favourite genre. After Taramani and Rocky, Tarun Teja's narration was the test. "When Tarun narrated the story of Asvins, I only had to ask myself whether such a horror film had ever come out in Tamil. Imagine the quality of this story when someone like me, who's not a fan of horror, feels compelled to do it." Teja wanted eccentric fear, not the usual faces. Vasanth said a redo would exhaust him psychologically, and that in acting terms this was his toughest film so far. He kept asking if he was overselling. Teja told him the audience would only sit on the edge if he went that far.

Cinema Express had already logged Teja as a Germany-based indie filmmaker expanding a short he made during the lockdown. Sri Venkateswara Cine Chitra paid the bills. The theatrical date they printed was June 23, 2023.

June 9 slipped. Rajiv Menon's daughter did not.

Wikipedia keeps the first theatrical target as June 9, then a postponement to June 23. It is Teja's feature debut, produced by B. V. S. N. Prasad and co-produced by Praveen Daniel. Saraswathi Menon, the daughter of director and cinematographer Rajiv Menon, made her acting debut as Rithvika. Vasanth plays her husband Arjun. Vimala Raman plays archaeologist Aarthi Rajagopalan. Mixed notices followed. The Times of India gave 2.5 out of 5. The South First gave 3. News18 Telugu called it an engaging psychological thriller at 2.75.

The Hindu's Gopinath Rajendran filed from the Tamil release on opening day. He called the story shallow and the last-act unravelling rushed. He still put the film among the scariest Tamil titles in a long time, heavy on found-footage jump scares, five chapters, and a UK mansion that floods at night until the estate becomes an island. The house once belonged to Aarthi, an archaeologist found dead with 15 people she had killed. He credited sound designer Vijay Siddharth, who had already worked the short. The review's runtime is 111 minutes. After Iruttu, he said Raman scores again in horror despite limited screen time.

OTTplay, writing before the streamer drop, said Netflix bought the post-theatrical rights and aimed for the second half of July. It also logged a simultaneous Tamil and Telugu theatrical release, an adults-only CBFC certificate, music by Vijay Siddharth, and cinematography by M. Edwin Sakay.

Netflix's U.S. Page lists the title as Asvins (Telugu), catalog number 81711449, TV-MA horror about vloggers inside an abandoned British mansion once owned by a mysterious archaeologist. TMDB keeps the India date of June 23, 2023, and the Telugu original title.

The official Tamil teaser is on YouTube if you want the two-voices, two-realms pitch before anyone opens the mansion door.

Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.

More titles in the same genres and with the same cast.