
Diego Luna
Martín de la Torre

“Not all goals are scored on the field.”
When a last-minute chance to host the 1986 World Cup appears, a cunning Mexican bureaucrat, armed with nothing but guts and audacity, cons his way through FIFA to beat the United States, but in a country of power games, every victory has a price.
I’ve seen this trick before. A scrappy underdog story, a last-minute bid, a nation rallying behind a dream—only to realize the real game was never on the field. Mexico 86 knows that too, and it leans into the ugliness with a grin. This isn’t Escape to Victory; it’s The Wolf of Wall Street in polyester suits, with a World Cup bid as the ultimate con.
The film follows Martín de la Torre (Diego Luna), a mid-level bureaucrat who stumbles into the chance of a lifetime: Mexico, still reeling from the 1985 earthquake, might host the 1986 World Cup if he can outmaneuver the U.S. in a last-minute FIFA vote. Martín’s weapon isn’t a playbook—it’s audacity. He lies, cheats, and schmoozes his way through backrooms, boardrooms, and bedrooms, all while the country’s elite circle like vultures.
The problem? Martín is the vulture. And the film, for all its energy, can’t decide whether to celebrate him or bury him.

Luna is magnetic here, the kind of actor who can make a smirk feel like a threat. He plays Martín as a man who’s always one step ahead—until he isn’t. The performance is a tightrope walk between charm and sleaze, and Luna nails it.
But the script keeps pulling its punches. One minute, Martín’s a lovable rogue; the next, he’s a corrupt opportunist. The tonal whiplash isn’t just a flaw—it’s the point.
Mexico in the 1980s was a place of contradictions: economic collapse and unchecked capitalism, tragedy and spectacle, a World Cup that somehow happened despite everything. The film wants to have it both ways, and sometimes, that works. Other times, it feels like it’s hedging its bets.
"A lively, well-acted World Cup satire powered by Diego Luna’s charisma, but held back by an unfocused script and a tone that wobbles between sharp drama and throwaway comedy."
Praise clusters around Diego Luna’s performance and the way the film turns a potentially dry political story into an energetic character piece set against the 1986 World Cup bid, with several viewers enjoying the blend of history, satire, and a convincingly rendered 1980s atmosphere. At the same time, many are disappointed that the plot drifts away from the tournament into a loose biopic of Martín de la Torre, with rushed time jumps, a composite protagonist, and humor that undercuts emotional stakes, making the experience entertaining but less impactful than the real events deserve.
Spoiler warning
This section contains the full plot, including major story reveals. Overview above stays spoiler-free.
You came for shady FIFA dealings and 80s mustaches; you stayed for the fact that Mexico 86 was basically built out of childhood memories, political ghosts, and one very unexpected Henry Kissinger cameo. Let’s crack open the real story behind Gabriel Ripstein’s Netflix comedy-history-drama.
In other words: behind the satire and 80s kitsch, Mexico 86 was built by people who lived the earthquake, worshipped the World Cup and decided that if they were finally going to tell the story, they might as well show us everything we weren’t supposed to see.
Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.
Movies
Related titles ranked by rating and popularity.