Skip to main content
Movie poster for Untold: The Shooting at Hawthorne Hill (2026)

Untold: The Shooting at Hawthorne Hill

2026
1h 13m
Director: Grace McNally
Play trailer
Search on Netflix

Overview

A retired Olympic equestrian takes on a new dressage student at his idyllic farm in New Jersey. Over time, tensions mount between the two, leading to 911 calls, cryptic social media posts, and accusations of spying. The feud culminates in a shocking act of violence and a trial that rocked the prestigious and sophisticated world of dressage.

Cast

9 people

Reviews

5 min read
AI-generated editorial review
The Dressage of Rage

I kept waiting for the horses to save it.

Not in the way you might think—some noble creature rearing up to break the tension, or a graceful pirouette cutting through the human ugliness. No, I just figured that in a documentary about Olympic-level equestrians, the animals themselves would offer some kind of visual or emotional counterweight to the two people at its center, both of whom seem determined to outdo each other in self-absorption. But the horses in Untold: The Shooting at Hawthorne Hill are mostly background players, their elegant movements reduced to set dressing for a feud that escalates from passive-aggressive barn drama to attempted murder. And that, in the end, might be the most damning thing about this film: it’s a story about people who’ve spent their lives training animals to perform beauty, yet can’t manage to behave like anything but spoiled children fighting over a sandbox.

A wide shot of Hawthorne Hill’s manicured pastures, horses grazing in the distance while a figure stands alone near the stable, back turned to the camera.

The setup is almost too perfect. Michael Barisone, a retired Olympic equestrian, runs a dressage farm in New Jersey—a world of tailored breeches, polished boots, and the kind of money that turns horse ownership into a full-time identity. Lauren Kanarek, a student with ambitions of her own, boards her horse at Hawthorne Hill, paying what amounts to a small mortgage every month for the privilege. What begins as a professional relationship curdles into something darker: accusations of spying, cryptic social media posts, 911 calls, and finally, in August 2019, Barisone shooting Kanarek twice in the chest. The trial that follows hinges on an insanity defense, a rare and messy gambit that turns the courtroom into a theater of competing narratives. Was this a calculated act of violence, or the breakdown of a man pushed past his limits? The film doesn’t so much answer the question as let both sides perform their versions of the truth, like two riders executing the same dressage test with entirely different scores.

What’s striking isn’t just the escalation—though the sheer pettiness of it all is darkly fascinating—but the way the film mirrors the dynamics of the feud itself. Director Grace McNally has both Barisone and Kanarek on camera, each given ample space to present their case. Barisone comes off as a man who sees himself as the wronged party, a mentor betrayed by a student who wouldn’t leave. Kanarek, for her part, is all wounded dignity, a woman who insists she was just trying to protect herself from a man she claims was stalking her. Neither is particularly likable, and the film doesn’t seem interested in making them so. Instead, it leans into the spectacle of their mutual loathing, framing their conflict as a kind of high-society true crime, where the stakes aren’t just life and death but reputation, ego, and the fragile hierarchies of the dressage world.

Audience Opinions

AI summary of viewer review patterns
Audience 5.2/10 AI
"A wild, ego-fueled true-crime feud that stays gripping through its absurd drama but frustrates with unlikable subjects and patchy storytelling."

The film hooks viewers with an almost unbelievable escalation between an Olympic trainer and his student, mixing volatile personalities, horse-world politics, and theatrical courtroom footage into a compulsively watchable mess. At the same time, both central figures are widely seen as arrogant and entitled, and gaps in background, omitted incidents, and uneven framing leave the case feeling murkier than it needed to be.

What viewers praise
  • Jaw-dropping real story The escalation from barn drama to attempted murder is so extreme and petty that it keeps attention even when the people involved are grating.
  • Entertaining trial sequences Courtroom scenes, especially the trainer’s over-the-top demeanor, play almost like performance art and are morbidly fascinating to watch.
  • Relatable horse-world chaos Equestrians recognize the boarder–trainer tensions and stable politics as exaggerated versions of dynamics that genuinely exist in the sport.
  • Engaging insanity-defense angle The rare use of an insanity plea and the chance to weigh whether the verdict fits the behavior spark a lot of debate and analysis.
Common complaints
  • No sympathetic center Both the trainer and student come across as toxic, self-absorbed, and insufferable, making it hard to feel genuine sympathy for either side.
  • Missing key context Crucial details about how the conflict started, certain alleged incidents, and wider background are skimmed or skipped, leaving the picture incomplete.
  • Perceived narrative bias The film appears to go soft on some players while hammering others, leading to complaints that the portrayal is lopsided rather than truly probing.
  • Uneven pacing and structure Stretches of the film feel dragged out or thinly padded, and several viewers felt the material either needed a tighter cut or a more in-depth multi-part format.
  • Ragebait tone The focus on outrageous quotes, explosive personalities, and social-media drama can feel more like provocation than thoughtful exploration of the case.
Recommended for
True crime binge-watchers Courtroom drama junkies Equestrian community insiders Messy character study fans Untold documentary followers

Full Plot (Spoilers)

AI-generated full plot summary Loading…

Buzz & Rumors

Public reports
AI-researched entertainment notes

Horses, Lawsuits & a “Declaration of War”: The Wild Real Story Behind Untold: The Shooting at Hawthorne Hill

Netflix promised a “twisty” true-crime doc. What it delivered with Untold: The Shooting at Hawthorne Hill is a sports-adjacent meltdown featuring Olympic dreams, Facebook warfare, and a post-release legal brawl that galloped straight out of the screen and into real life.


Behind the Camera: How They Landed BOTH Sides of a Shooting

  • Director Grace McNally pulled off the true-crime equivalent of booking Beyoncé and Jay-Z post–elevator: she got both Michael Barisone and Lauren Kanarek to sit for in‑depth, on‑camera interviews.
  • Barisone, the retired Olympic equestrian, and Kanarek, the student he shot in 2019, are interviewed separately, each delivering their own “most favorable version” of the same nightmare timeline.
  • Reviewers called the double booking “a heck of a get,” noting how rare it is in true crime to have both shooter and surviving victim calmly unpacking their sides on the same film.
  • Friends and family from both camps were also brought in to weigh in, turning the doc into less a whodunnit than a “who do you hate less?” social autopsy of the horse world.

From Discovery to Netflix: The Evidence Dump You Didn’t See

  • Barisone’s team handed producers “literally hundreds of pages of evidence” from criminal-case discovery—much of which never made it into the trial itself due to evidentiary rules.
  • Those documents included 911 calls, social media posts, and other materials that defense supporters say show what was “going on during the weeks and months leading to the incident.”
  • The documentary leans into those elements—911 calls, cryptic posts, accusations of spying—to show how a posh dressage farm became a pressure cooker.
  • Netflix slaps a disclaimer at the end, acknowledging that additional documents and evidence from both sides weren’t included, hinting that we’re only seeing a carefully curated slice of the chaos.

The Lawsuit Plot Twist: When the Documentary Becomes the Crime

  • Within weeks of the doc’s April 21, 2026 release, the Kanarek family filed a lawsuit against Netflix, claiming the film framed Barisone as the real victim and damaged Lauren’s reputation.
  • They say both Untold and an earlier CBS 48 Hours episode were “defamatory,” with Lauren’s father describing the coverage as “so defamatory about Lauren” that the family was “flabbergasted.”
  • The family requested a pre‑release screener—partly so Lauren could brace for the portrayal and manage her anxiety—but Netflix and producer Propagate reportedly refused.
  • Their lawyer argues the films are not “a slice of victim advocacy” and instead amplify a narrative where Lauren is vilified and Barisone is recast as the tragic, broken hero.

Money, Horses & Who Got Paid

  • Real-life stakes: Kanarek was reportedly paying around $5,000 a month to train and board at Hawthorne Hill—this was less a hobby, more a full‑time high-end lifestyle.
  • Netflix reportedly paid Kanarek for her participation in the doc. Barisone, however, was not paid, according to coverage citing his supporters.
  • Meanwhile, a GoFundMe for Barisone’s legal expenses pulled in more than $85,000 as the case and subsequent media attention snowballed.
  • Netflix, for its part, scored big: the doc cracked the platform’s Top 10, logging millions of views and sliding neatly into the streamer’s “beautiful trauma monetized with better lighting” business model.

The Facebook “Declaration of War” & the Internet Spiral

  • One of the most infamous artifacts orbiting the doc is a long 2019 Facebook post by Kanarek that Barisone’s defense later branded a “declaration of war.”
  • That post, plus a stream of other social media skirmishes, became Exhibit A in the public’s obsession and is highlighted in post‑release breakdowns of the case.
  • Commentators note that what really hooked the internet wasn’t just the shooting—it was the combustible combo of elite dressage culture, housing disputes, $5k‑a‑month horse bills, and a feud conducted half in court and half on Facebook.
  • Viewers on Reddit and Facebook called the documentary “strange,” “a head to head of terrible personalities,” and “like watching the civil trial that follows a criminal trial,” mirroring the film’s vibe of never‑ending litigation-by-interview.

In the end, Untold: The Shooting at Hawthorne Hill isn’t just a documentary—it’s an ongoing shared universe of court filings, Facebook posts, SafeSport bans, and dueling narratives. The horses may be background players, but the human drama? That’s pure, premium‑grade Netflix fodder.

Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.