
Prabhas
Raghava

7000 years ago, Ayodhya's Prince Raghava and Prince Sesh along with the Mighty Vanar Warriors travels to the island of Lanka with an aim to rescue Raghava's wife Janaki, who has been abducted by Lankesh, the king of Lanka.
I’ve seen my share of films that try to drag ancient epics into the present, but Adipurush doesn’t just stumble—it faceplants into the uncanny valley of mythological adaptation. Here is a movie that wants to be both reverent and revolutionary, a CGI spectacle that treats the Ramayana like a Marvel script. The result is less divine intervention, more digital indigestion.
Om Raut’s film arrives with the weight of expectation: a ₹500–800 crore budget, Prabhas fresh off the Baahubali phenomenon, and the promise of finally giving India its own mythological blockbuster. But somewhere between the green screens and the modern slang, the soul of the epic gets lost. The Indian Express’s Shubhra Gupta put it bluntly: "a series of clunky computer graphics, bathed in Bollywoodese." That’s the problem in a nutshell—everything is big, but nothing feels grand.

Take the dialogue, for instance. Manoj Muntashir’s script doesn’t just modernize the language—it weaponizes it. Lines like "jalegī tere bāp kī" (your father will burn) land with the grace of a meme dropped into a temple sermon.
The intent is clear: make the gods relatable. The effect? They sound like they’ve wandered off the set of a 90s masala flick.
Simon Abrams at RogerEbert.com called the writing "cheap and uninspired," and it’s hard to disagree. When even the villain’s taunts feel like they were written for a WhatsApp forward, the stakes evaporate.
"A visually ambitious but poorly executed mythological retelling that disappoints fans and casual viewers alike."
Expectations were high for a grand adaptation of the Ramayana, but the execution lacks depth, with weak dialogue, inconsistent CGI, and uneven performances. The scale and Prabhas's star power earn some credit, but overall the film fails to deliver on its promise, and its pacing and narrative choices frustrate.
Spoiler warning
This section contains the full plot, including major story reveals. Overview above stays spoiler-free.
Om Raut’s Adipurush (2023) was one of the most hyped films of the year, promising a grand retelling of the Hindu epic Ramayana with Prabhas as Lord Ram and Saif Ali Khan as the demon king Ravana. But long before its June 16 release, the film found itself mired in controversy—from backlash over its VFX to accusations of cultural insensitivity. latestnetflix.com's read is that here’s a breakdown of the drama that dogged the big-budget production.
The first major controversy erupted when the film’s teaser dropped. Fans and critics alike panned the visual effects, calling them subpar for a project with such high stakes. Social media erupted with memes mocking the CGI, particularly the depiction of characters and action sequences, which many felt looked more like a video game than a cinematic spectacle. The backlash was swift, with some accusing the makers of rushing the VFX to meet the release date.
Another flashpoint came when director Om Raut and actress Kriti Sanon visited the Lord Venkateswara temple in Tirupati ahead of the film’s release. Photos of the visit showed Raut and Sanon in what some deemed inappropriate attire, leading to accusations of disrespecting religious sentiments. While the team maintained that the visit was a personal pilgrimage, the optics fueled further criticism.
Saif Ali Khan, who played Ravana, added fuel to the fire with his remarks about the character. In interviews, he described Ravana as a "scholar" and a "victim of circumstances," which some interpreted as an attempt to humanize the demon king. This sparked outrage among conservative groups, who accused the film of distorting sacred mythology. Protests erupted in several states, with calls to ban the film for allegedly misrepresenting Hindu scriptures.
Even after its release, Adipurush couldn’t escape controversy. Some Hindu groups demanded bans, arguing that the film’s portrayal of deities and mythological figures was inaccurate and offensive. Petitions were filed in courts, and protests were held in cities like Mumbai and Hyderabad. The film’s dialogue, costumes, and even Kriti Sanon’s portrayal of Sita came under scrutiny, with critics calling it a "commercialized" and "watered-down" version of the epic.
Director Om Raut defended the film, stating that Adipurush was a creative interpretation and not a literal adaptation of the Ramayana. He acknowledged the VFX criticisms but stood by the film’s vision, arguing that mythology should be open to artistic reinterpretation. However, the damage was done—the controversies overshadowed the film’s box-office performance and critical reception.
Despite the hype, Adipurush struggled to live up to expectations. The controversies, combined with mixed reviews, left the film’s legacy tarnished. While it had its share of defenders, the backlash highlighted the challenges of adapting sacred texts for modern audiences—especially when visual effects and creative liberties become lightning rods for debate.
Entertainment rumors and trivia aggregated from public reporting. Treat speculation as unverified unless a cited source confirms it.
More titles in the same genres and with the same cast.